The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporeal moderation: digital labour as affective good
Abstract
Digital labour scholars have produced insightful analyses of the unpaid, creative, affective labour performed by users on social media platforms. Meanwhile, an increasing number of scholars have been studying the hidden labour of content moderators: underpaid, contingent workers who enable the sanitised online spaces that users take for granted by removing disturbing content. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with third-party Facebook content moderators in the USA and Ireland, I argue that the case of content moderation affords us a new way of putting these approaches into conversation with one another. Specifically, I illustrate how content moderators perform affective labour – for themselves and for the platform – in ways that make possible the monetisation of users’ cultural activities. In doing so, I draw attention to the human costs of maintaining user ‘safety’ and thus the profitability of large social media platforms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“commonly not afforded the same benefits and provisions as offered to other professionals (Roberts, 2019; Jereza, 2021)”
From The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Jereza, 2021
In the citing paper
“frequently located in the global south”
From The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Jereza, 2021
Citations
Cites
Terranova, T. (2000) · Social Text · doi:10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33 · Cited by 1,749
Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media
ROBERTS, S. T. (2019) · Yale University Press · doi:10.2307/j.ctvhrcz0v · Cited by 339
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1177/1329878X16665177 · DOI
- Anderson B., 2011, Taking‐place: non‐representational theories and geography
- 10.1177/1527476407307241 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822375715 · DOI
- 10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609 · DOI
- 10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.8 · DOI
- Broek D., 2002, Monitoring and surveillance in call centers: some responses from Australian workers, Labor & Industry, 12
- Carmi E., 2019, The hidden listeners: regulating the line from telephone operators to content moderators, International Journal of Communication, 13, 440
- Dalla Costa M., 1972, The power of women and the subversion of the community
- Federici S., 2012, Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle
- 10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.6 · DOI
- Gillespie T., 2018, Custodians of the internet: platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media
- Gray M., 2019, Ghost work: how to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass
- Hardt M., 2000, Empire
- Hochschild A., 1983, The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling
- Huws U., 2014, Labor in the global digital economy: the cybertariat comes of age
- 10.1177/1527476413487607 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/hypa.12008 · DOI
- Maly I., 2019, New right metapolitics and the algorithmic activism of Schild & Vrienden, Social Media + Society, 1
- 10.7591/cornell/9780801450648.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1469540513509641 · DOI
- Roberts S. T., 2016, Digital refuse: Canadian garbage, commercial content moderation and the global circulation of social media’s waste, Media Studies Publications, 14
- Ross A., 2013, Digital labor: the internet as playground and factory, 13
- 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095843 · DOI
- Salonga A. O., 2019, Enactments of nationhood in transnational call centres, 121
- Scholz T., 2013, Digital labor: the internet as playground and factory
- Zuboff S., 2018, The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study
Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-8 · Cited by 48
“…the business model of many online platforms (Barrett, 2020) moderators remain an undervalued, often hidden profession (Gillespie, 2018), frequently located in the global south and commonly not afforded the same benefits and provisions as offered to other professionals (Roberts, 2019; Jereza, 2021).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jereza, R.
- Affiliations
- New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jereza, Rae
- ORCID
- Jereza, Rae
- Venue
- Social Anthropology
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 928-943
- ISSN
- 0964-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8676
- OpenAlex
- W3212787638
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Keywords
- content moderation, affective labor, digital labor, Facebook, social networking sites, user safety, embodiment, platform capitalism, hidden work
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review