Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Which women are at an increased risk of a caesarean section or an instrumental vaginal birth in the UK: an exploration within the Millennium Cohort Study

Essex, HN, Green, J, Baston, H, Pickett, KE·2013·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To explore the maternal demographic factors associated with operative births (instrumental vaginal births or caesarean section), after adjustment for health, interpersonal, pregnancy, labour and infant covariates. Design: Nationally representative cohort study. Setting: Women giving birth in the UK, during the period 2000–2002. Sample: A total of 18 239 mother–infant pairs. Methods: Multinomial logistic regression models were estimated to explore the relationship between demographic characteristics and mode of birth, stratified by parity. Main outcome measures: Self‐reported mode of birth, defined as unassisted vaginal birth, instrumental vaginal birth, emergency caesarean section and planned caesarean section. Results: For primiparous women, operative births rose steeply with increasing maternal age. Women from lower occupational status households were at an increased risk of planned caesarean section. Mode of birth differed significantly by ethnicity. For multiparous women, a younger age at first birth was protective of a later caesarean section or instrumental vaginal birth at the cohort birth. Women with qualifications normally taken at the age 18 years were at an increased risk of planned caesarean section compared with women with degree‐level qualifications. Mode of birth differed significantly by ethnicity, and non‐UK born women were at an increased risk of emergency caesarean section. Conclusions: The sociodemographic characteristics of UK women independently predict mode of birth. Further research is needed to establish to what extent sociodemographic differences in mode of birth are a reflection of the attitudes and behaviours of women, or health professionals, and are therefore amenable to change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.12177

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011, Caesarean Section: Clinical Guideline
  2. 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00377.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.07.019 · DOI
  5. 10.2105/AJPH.91.3.436 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.10.014 · DOI
  7. RCOG, 2011, Operative Vaginal Delivery: Guideline No. 26
  8. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01032.x · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892 · DOI
  10. Thomas J, 2001, The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report
  11. 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.5.18097 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00657.x · DOI
  13. 10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1399 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-330 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.05.002 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/bmj.315.7103.279 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1136/bmj.c5065 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00501.x · DOI
  19. 10.1093/ije/dyh401 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1057/hsq.2011.3 · DOI
  21. Dex S, 2004, Millennium Cohort Study First Survey: A User's Guide to Initial Findings
  22. Plewis Ie, 2004, Millennium Cohort Study First Survey: Technical Report on Sampling
  23. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01203.x · DOI
  24. 10.1136/bmj.39532.688877.25 · DOI
  25. 10.1136/bmj.297.6647.515 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/jech.2008.082594 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/13645570701676955 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000175839.46609.8e · DOI
  29. 10.1002/0471722146.ch8 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00409.x · DOI
  31. 10.2105/AJPH.84.1.37 · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00409.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0002-9378(85)80166-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1067/mob.2000.106249 · DOI
  35. 10.1067/mob.2001.117364 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/07399330600817535 · DOI
  37. Nazroo J, 1997, The Health of Britain's Ethnic Minorities
  38. Katbamna S, 2000, ‘Race’ and Childbirth
  39. 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009067 · DOI
  40. Bowes A, 2003, Gender, Identity and Reproduction: Social Perspectives, 87, 10.1057/9780230522930_6 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346882 · DOI
  42. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007153 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1993.tb00438.x · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1991.tb00103.x · DOI
  45. Dezateux C, 2006, Millennium Cohort Study: Birth Registration and Maternity Hospital Episode Statistics Linkage. A Guide to the SPSS Dataset
  46. 10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036568.02655.f8 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wilkinson R, 2003, Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts
  48. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.007 · DOI
  49. Nelson M, 2001, Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care, and Midwifery in North America and Europe, 87
  50. 10.1136/jech.52.8.501 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90351-R · DOI
  52. Macfarlane A, 2000, Birth Counts: Statistics of Pregnancy and Childbirth
  53. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00140.x · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0266-6138(05)80169-X · DOI

Cited by

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Essex, H., Green, J., Baston, H., & Pickett, K.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-20
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
732-743
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
60
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.