Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries

Open access
Zeitlin, J, Szamotulska, K, Drewniak, N, Mohangoo, AD, Chalmers, J, Sakkeus, L, Irgens, L, Gatt, M, Gissler, M, Blondel, B, The Euro‐Peristat Preterm Study Group·2013·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To investigate time trends in preterm birth in E urope by multiplicity, gestational age, and onset of delivery. Design: Analysis of aggregate data from routine sources. Setting: Nineteen E uropean countries. Population: Live births in 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008. Methods: Annual risk ratios of preterm birth in each country were estimated with year as a continuous variable for all births and by subgroup using log‐binomial regression models. Main outcome measures: Overall preterm birth rate and rate by multiplicity, gestational age group, and spontaneous versus non‐spontaneous (induced or prelabour caesarean section) onset of labour. Results: Preterm birth rates rose in most countries, but the magnitude of these increases varied. Rises in the multiple birth rate as well as in the preterm birth rate for multiple births contributed to increases in the overall preterm birth rate. About half of countries experienced no change or decreases in the rates of singleton preterm birth. Where preterm birth rates rose, increases were no more prominent at 35–36 weeks of gestation than at 32–34 weeks of gestation. Variable trends were observed for spontaneous and non‐spontaneous preterm births in the 13 countries with mode of onset data; increases were not solely attributed to non‐spontaneous preterm births. Conclusions: There was a wide variation in preterm birth trends in European countries. Many countries maintained or reduced rates of singleton preterm birth over the past 15 years, challenging a widespread belief that rising rates are the norm. Understanding these cross‐country differences could inform strategies for the prevention of preterm birth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.12281

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Zeitlin, J., Szamotulska, K., Drewniak, N., Mohangoo, A., Chalmers, J., Sakkeus, L., Irgens, L., Gatt, M., Gissler, M., Blondel, B., & The Euro‐Peristat Preterm Study Group
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-05-24
Volume
120
Issue
11
Pages
1356-1365
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2040056908
Cited by
328
References
2
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1471-0528.12281
The paper
Zeitlin, J., Szamotulska, K., Drewniak, N., Mohangoo, A., Chalmers, J., Sakkeus, L., Irgens, L., Gatt, M., Gissler, M., Blondel, B., & The Euro‐Peristat Preterm Study Group. (2013). Preterm birth time trends in Europe: a study of 19 countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12281

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.