Cited by 235Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

The preterm birth syndrome: issues to consider in creating a classification system

Open access
Goldenberg, Robert L., Gravett, Michael G., Iams, Jay, Papageorghiou, Aris T., Waller, Sarah A., Kramer, Michael, Culhane, Jennifer, Barros, Fernando +4 more·2012·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

A comprehensive classification system for preterm birth requires expanded gestational boundaries that recognize the early origins of preterm parturition and emphasize fetal maturity over fetal age. Exclusion of stillbirths, pregnancy terminations, and multifetal gestations prevents comprehensive consideration of the potential causes and presentations of preterm birth. Any step in parturition (cervical softening and ripening, decidual-membrane activation, and/or myometrial contractions) may initiate preterm parturition, and should be recorded for every preterm birth, as should the condition of the mother, fetus, newborn, and placenta, before a phenotype is assigned.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.865

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automatic computer-assisted diagnosis reduces errors caused by subjective judgment and provides a standardization tool to improve diagnosis efficiency.

    “Automatic computer-assisted diagnosis not only reduces errors caused by subjective judgment [8] but also provides an attractive and meaningful standardization tool [9 -11] to improve the ef fi ciency of diagnosis.”

    From DilatedFormer: dilated granularity transformer network for placental maturity grading in ultrasound (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The paper’s sections on creating a preterm-birth classification system and on classification by phenotype discuss how births should be categorized, not automatic computer-assisted diagnosis. Searches for subjective-judgment errors and diagnostic efficiency found no passage in our copy addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Klebanoff MA, Shiono PH. Top down, bot- tom up and inside out: reflections on preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1995;9:125-9.
  2. Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Medically in- duced preterm birth: recognizing the impor- tance of the problem. Clin Perinatol 2008;35: 53-67.
  3. Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Kinzler WL. The in- fluence of obstetric interventions on trends in twin stillbirths, United States1989-1999. J Ma- tern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:380-7.
  4. Klebanoff MA. Conceptualizing categories of preterm birth. Prenatal Neonatal Med 1998; 3:13-5.
  5. Kierse MJNC. Elective induction, selective deduction and cesarean section. Birth 2010; 37:252-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, R. L., Gravett, M. G., Iams, J., Papageorghiou, A. T., Waller, S. A., Kramer, M., Culhane, J., Barros, F., Conde-Agudelo, A., Bhutta, Z. A., Knight, H. E., & Villar, J.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Universidade Católica de Pelotas (BR)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
206
Issue
2
Pages
113-118
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974716010
Cited by
235
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (49038)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
preterm birth, gestational age, fetal maturity, cervical ripening, myometrial contraction, multiple pregnancy, placenta
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Pregnancy, Parturition, Premature Birth, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review