The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Caesarean section was initially performed to save the lives of the mother and/or her baby. Caesarean section rates have risen substantially worldwide over the past decades. In this study, we set out to compile all available caesarean section rates worldwide at the country level, and to identify the appropriate caesarean section rate at the population level associated with the minimal maternal and neonatal mortality. Design: Ecological study using longitudinal data. Setting: Worldwide country‐level data. Population: A total of 159 countries were included in the analyses, representing 98.0% of global live births (2005). Methods: Nationally representative caesarean section rates from 2000 to 2012 were compiled. We assessed the relationship between caesarean section rates and mortality outcomes, adjusting for socio‐economic development by means of human development index (HDI) using fractional polynomial regression models. Main outcome measures: Maternal mortality ratio and neonatal mortality rate. Results: Most countries have experienced increases in caesarean section rate during the study period. In the unadjusted analysis, there was a negative association between caesarean section rates and mortality outcomes for low caesarean section rates, especially among the least developed countries. After adjusting for HDI, this effect was much smaller and was only observed below a caesarean section rate of 5–10%. No important association between the caesarean section rate and maternal and neonatal mortality was observed when the caesarean section rate exceeded 10%. Conclusions: Although caesarean section is an effective intervention to save maternal and infant lives, based on the available ecological evidence, caesarean section rates higher than around 10% at the population level are not associated with decreases in maternal and neonatal mortality rates, and thus may not be necessary to achieve the lowest maternal and neonatal mortality. Tweetable abstract: The caesarean section rate of around 10% may be the optimal rate to achieve the lowest mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology
Royston, P., Ambler, G., & Sauerbrei, W. (1999) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/28.5.964 · Cited by 1,066
Souza, J. P., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Vogel, J., Carroli, G., Lumbiganon, P., Qureshi, Z., Costa, M. J., Fawole, B., Mugerwa, Y., Nafiou, I., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60686-8 · Cited by 757
Self-citationAPPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY FOR BIRTH
(1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92750-3 · Cited by 594
Cited by
Miller, S., Abalos, E., Chamillard, M., Ciapponi, A., Colaci, D., Comandé, D., Diaz, V., Geller, S., Hanson, C., Langer, A., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31472-6 · Cited by 1,181
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates
Betran, A., Torloni, M., Zhang, J., Gülmezoglu, A., & the WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13526 · Cited by 1,238
Self-citation(2015) · Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007 · Cited by 1,079
Sobhy, S., Arroyo-Manzano, D., Murugesu, N., Karthikeyan, G., Kumar, V., Kaur, I., Fernandez, E., Gundabattula, S. R., Betran, A. P., Khan, K., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32386-9 · Cited by 369
Self-citationGlobal increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action
Angolile, C. M., Max, B. L., Mushemba, J., & Mashauri, H. L. (2023) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.1274 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, J., Zhang, J., Mikolajczyk, R., Torloni, M., Gülmezoglu, A., & Betran, A.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-24
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 745-753
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1558039703
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1471-0528.13592
- The paper
- Ye, J., Zhang, J., Mikolajczyk, R., Torloni, M., Gülmezoglu, A., & Betran, A. (2016). Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13592
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.