Cited by 29Birth, Development, and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Offspring birthweight by gestational age and parental cardiovascular mortality: a population‐based cohort study

Open access
Morken, N‐H, Halland, F, DeRoo, LA, Wilcox, AJ, Skjærven, R·2018·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To estimate risk of parental cardiovascular disease mortality by offspring birthweight. Design: Population‐based cohort study. Setting and population: Norwegian mothers and fathers with singleton births during 1967–2002 were followed until 2009 by linkage to the Norwegian cause of death registry. Methods: Hazard ratios by offspring absolute birthweight in grams and birthweight adjusted for gestational age (z‐score) were calculated using Cox regression and adjusted for parental age at delivery and year of first birth. Stratified analyses on preterm and term births were performed. Main outcome measures: Maternal and paternal cardiovascular mortality. Results: We followed 711 726 mothers and 700 212 fathers and found a strong link between maternal cardiovascular mortality and offspring birthweight but only slight evidence of associations in fathers. Adjusting birthweight for gestational age (by z‐score) uncovered an unexpected strong association of large birthweight (z‐score > 2.5) with mothers’ cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 3.0, 95% CI 2.0–4.6). This risk was apparently restricted to preterm births. In stratified analyses (preterm and term births) hazard ratios for maternal cardiovascular mortality were 1.5 (1.03–2.2) for large preterm babies and 0.9 (0.7–1.2) for large term babies (P‐value for interaction = 0.02), using normal weight preterm and term, respectively, as references. Conclusion: Women having large preterm babies are at increased risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular mortality. The birth of a large preterm baby should increase clinical vigilance for onset of diabetes and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. Tweetable abstract: Birth of a large preterm baby should increase vigilance for cardiovascular‐disease risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.14522

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and hyperglycaemia during pregnancy negatively affect fetuses and neonates, including intrauterine growth restriction, macrosomia, preterm birth, low birthweight and adverse outcomes later in life.

    “Negative influences of HDP and hyperglycaemia during pregnancy on fetuses and neonates include, but are not limited to, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and macrosomia, preterm birth, low birthweight and adverse outcomes later in life11.”

    From A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Methods and Discussion (page unavailable) examine offspring birth size and gestational age in relation to parental cardiovascular mortality and maternal diabetes in a subsequent pregnancy. Searches for hypertensive disorders, pregnancy hyperglycaemia, fetal growth restriction, macrosomia, and later offspring outcomes found no passage addressing the claimed effects of those conditions on fetuses or neonates. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morken, N., Halland, F., DeRoo, L., Wilcox, A., & Skjærven, R.
Affiliations
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
  • Epidemiology Branch NIEHS/NIH Durham NC USA
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Morken, N‐H
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
336-341
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2586430971
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Universitetet i Bergen
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight z-score, diabetes risk, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Norway, Parents, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Parental Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review