Cited by 28Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Pregnancy weight gain by gestational age and stillbirth: a population‐based cohort study

Open access
Johansson, K, Hutcheon, JA, Bodnar, LM, Cnattingius, S, Stephansson, O·2018·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between total and early pregnancy (<22 completed weeks) weight gain and risk of stillbirth, stratified by early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Stockholm-Gotland Region, Sweden. POPULATION: Pregnant women with singleton births (n = 160 560). METHODS: Pregnancy weight gain was standardised into gestational age-specific z-scores. For analyses of total pregnancy weight gain, a matched design with an incidence density sampling approach was used. Findings were also contrasted with current Institute of Medicine (IOM) weight gain recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stillbirth defined as fetal death at ≥22 completed weeks of gestation. RESULTS: For all BMI categories, there was no statistical association between total or early pregnancy weight gain and stillbirth within the range of a weight gain z-score of -2.0 SD to +2.0 SD. Among normal-weight women, the adjusted odds ratio of stillbirth for lower (-2.0 to -1.0 SD) and higher (+1.0 to +1.9 SD) total weight gain was 0.85 (95% CI; 0.48-1.49) and 1.03 (0.60-1.77), respectively, as compared with the reference category. Further, there were no associations between total or early pregnancy weight gain and stillbirth within the range of weight gain currently recommended by the IOM. For the majority of the BMI categories, the point estimates at the extremes of weight gain values (<-2.0SD and ≥2.0 SD) suggested protective effects of low weight gain and increased risks of high weight gain, but estimates were imprecise and not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We found no associations between total or early pregnancy weight gain and stillbirth across the range of weight gain experienced by most women. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There was no association between weight gain during pregnancy and stillbirth among most women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.15034

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Johansson et al. reported a greater risk of stillbirth with excessive GWG but only in women of normal weight pre-pregnancy.

    “Johansson et al. 43 reported a greater risk of stillbirth with excessive GWG but only in women of normal weight pre‐pregnancy.”

    From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results report a higher point estimate for stillbirth at extremely high total weight gain among normal-weight women, but its confidence interval includes no increase (aOR 1.63; 95% CI 0.37–7.11). The Conclusion calls this a trend requiring further study, not an established greater risk. The claim overstates the certainty of the finding and does not specify that it concerns extreme total weight gain. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Frøen JF, Friberg IK, Lawn JE, Bhutta ZA, Pattinson RC, Allanson ER, et al. Stillbirths: progress and unfinished business. Lancet 2016; 387: 574– 86. 26794077
  2. [2]Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high‐income countries. Lancet 2016; 387: 691– 702. 26794070
  3. [4]Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2014; 311: 1536– 46. 24737366
  4. [5]Cnattingius S, Villamor E. Weight change between successive pregnancies and risks of stillbirth and infant mortality: a nationwide cohort study. Lancet 2016; 387: 558– 65. 26651225
  5. [6]Institute of Medicine (US), National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2009.
  6. [7]Cnattingius S, Stephansson O. The epidemiology of stillbirth. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26: 25– 30. 11876563
  7. [9]Hutcheon JA, Bodnar LM, Joseph KS, Abrams B, Simhan HN, Platt RW. The bias in current measures of gestational weight gain. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 109– 16. 22324496 PMC4036628
  8. [10]Hutcheon JA, Oken E. Towards defining optimal gestational weight gain. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2016; 3: 12– 8.
  9. [11]Gaillard R, Steegers EA, Franco OH, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Maternal weight gain in different periods of pregnancy and childhood cardio‐metabolic outcomes. The Generation R Study. Int J Obes 2015; 39: 677– 85. 25287752
  10. [12]Johansson K, Hutcheon JA, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Pregnancy weight gain by gestational age and BMI in Sweden: a population‐based cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103: 1278– 84. 27009753
  11. [13]Stephansson O, Sandstrom A, Petersson G, Wikstrom AK, Cnattingius S. Prolonged second stage of labour, maternal infectious disease, urinary retention and other complications in the early postpartum period. BJOG 2015; 123: 608– 16. 25601143 PMC6680275
  12. [14]World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic ‐ Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. 11234459
  13. [15]Lubin JH, Gail MH. Biased selection of controls for case‐control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics 1984; 40: 63– 75. 6375751
  14. [16]Howards PP, Schisterman EF, Poole C, Kaufman JS, Weinberg CR. “Toward a clearer definition of confounding” revisited with directed acyclic graphs. Am J Epidemiol 2012; 176: 506– 11. 22904203 PMC3530354
  15. [17]Weinberg CR. Toward a clearer definition of confounding. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137: 1– 8. 8434568
  16. [18]Weinberg CR. Should we adjust for pregnancy history when the exposure effect is transient? Epidemiology 1995; 6: 335– 7. 7619949
  17. [19]Naeye RL. Weight gain and the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 3– 9. 474659
  18. [20]Rydhström H, Tydén T, Herbst A, Ljungblad U, Walles B. No relation between maternal weight gain and stillbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 779– 81. 7817728
  19. [21]Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson A, Cnattingius S. Maternal weight, pregnancy weight gain, and the risk of antepartum stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 463– 9. 11228504
  20. [22]Bodnar LM, Parks WT, Perkins K, Pugh SJ, Platt RW, Feghali M, et al. Maternal prepregnancy obesity and cause‐specific stillbirth. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102: 858– 64. 26310539 PMC4588742

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansson, K., Hutcheon, J., Bodnar, L., Cnattingius, S., & Stephansson, O.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
  • Department of Epidemiology Graduate School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Corresponding author
Johansson, K
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-28
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
973-981
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2769321084
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2014‐0073, 2015‐00251)
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting (20140105, 20150179)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2013‐2429)
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD072008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
gestational weight gain, stillbirth, body mass index, Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations, fetal death, singleton pregnancy
MeSH terms
Gestational Weight Gain, Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review