Effect of couple‐based cognitive behavioural intervention on prevention of postnatal depression: multisite randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare a couple‐based cognitive behavioural intervention ( CBI ) for postnatal depression with CBI delivered to women alone and control (standard perinatal care). Design: Multisite randomised controlled trial. Setting: Antenatal clinics at three regional public hospitals in Hong Kong. Sample: 388 low‐risk childbearing couples. Methods: Childbearing couples were randomly allocated to couple‐based CBI ( n = 134), women‐alone CBI ( n = 124) or control ( n = 130). The CBI consists of a 3‐hour antenatal group session and two 30‐minute postnatal telephone follow‐up sessions. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was depressive symptoms, measured on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale ( EPDS ). Assessments were collected at baseline (during pregnancy), 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postpartum. Results: Depressive symptoms were significantly more improved at 6 weeks postpartum for mothers in couple‐based CBI than in women‐alone CBI (difference 1.46, 95% CI 0.11–2.81) or control groups (difference 1.71, 95% CI 0.29–3.13). The proportion of mothers with postnatal depression ( EPDS score ≥ 10) was significantly lower at 6 weeks postpartum in couple‐based CBI than in control (difference 17.8%, 95% CI 3.6–32.0). However, the treatment effect was not maintained at 6 and 12 months. There was no significant intervention effect among fathers. Conclusions: Couple‐based CBI is more effective than CBI delivered to mothers alone and standard perinatal care in reducing the incidence of postnatal depression among Chinese mothers in the early postpartum period. Tweetable abstract: Couple‐based cognitive behavioural intervention is effective in reducing postnatal depression among Chinese mothers in the early postpartum period.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research indicates that involving spouses in interventions positively influences maternal mental health.
“Additionally, research indicates that involving spouses in interventions positively influences maternal mental health [44], possibly by increasing husbands’ understanding of the perinatal period, thus enabling them to offer better psychological support to their partners.”
From The traumatic childbirth experience of mothers after emergency cesarean section(EmCS) in China: a descriptive qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Pearson, R. M., Evans, J., Kounali, D., Lewis, G., Heron, J., Ramchandani, P. G., O’Connor, T. G., & Stein, A. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2163 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Matthey, S., Barnett, B., Kavanagh, D. J., & Howie, P. (2001) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00236-6 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Ngai, F.-W., Chan, S. W.-C., & Ip, W.-Y. (2009) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.007 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictors of maternal and paternal depressive symptoms at postpartum
Ngai, F.-W., & Ngu, S.-F. (2015) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.12.003 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, X., Laplante, D. P., Paquin, V., Lafortune, S., Elgbeili, G., & King, S. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102129 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Exploring the Limits of Artificial Intelligence for Referencing Scientific Articles
Graf, E. M., McKinney, J. A., Dye, A. B., Lin, L., & Sanchez-Ramos, L. (2024) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1786033 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ma, L., Chong, M. C., Lee, W. L., Yang, H., & Lian, Y. (2025) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-025-07213-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ngai, F., Wong, P., Chung, K., Chau, P., & Hui, P.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Hospital Authority (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Ngai, F‐W
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-24
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 500-507
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2953842314
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- postpartum depression, couple-based interventions, cognitive-behavioural intervention, telephone follow-up, fathers, Chinese mothers, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Prenatal Care, Sexual Partners, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Depression, Postpartum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review