The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Some Women Consent to Unwanted Sex With a Dating Partner: Insights from Attachment Theory
Abstract
Several studies have shown that many college women engage in unwanted sexual activity with a dating partner. However, little research has examined the differences between women who comply with requests for unwanted sexual activity and women who do not. This study utilized an attachment theory framework to investigate individual differences in women's compliant sexual behavior. An ethnically diverse sample of 125 college women who had consented to unwanted sex with a current dating partner completed measures of their attachment style, commitment to their current relationship, perceptions of their partner's commitment, and willingness to consent to unwanted sex in a hypothetical scenario. Results showed that attachment style and commitment perceptions were associated with women's willingness to consent to unwanted sex with a dating partner in the hypothetical scenario and their reasons for this decision. As predicted, anxiously attached women were the most willing to consent to unwanted sex, and they often cited fears that their partner would lose interest in them as reasons for their compliance. Contrary to hypotheses, avoidantly attached women were not the least willing to consent to unwanted sex. They often reported passively complying with a partner's sexual request in order to fulfill relationship obligations. The importance of sexuality to attachment formation in dating relationships and the potential consequences of consenting to unwanted sex are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247 · cited 3×
“Research shows that individuals who score high on the dimension of avoidance tend to feel emotionally distant in relationships and become apprehensive when a partner tries to get too close (Collins & Read, 1990; Hazan & Shaver, 1987).”
Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644 · Cited by 3,678
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327 · Cited by 2,110 · cited 1×
“These findings extend previous research demonstrating that anxiously attached individuals are overly sensitive to rejection (Downey & Feldman, 1996; Downey et al., 1998) by showing that fear of rejection translates into behavior, and more specifically, sexual behaviors that are at least partially…”
Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.
Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.50.3.455 · Cited by 1,444
Attachment Security in Infancy and Early Adulthood: A Twenty-Year Longitudinal Study
Waters, E., Merrick, S., Treboux, D., Crowell, J., & Albersheim, L. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00176 · Cited by 1,228
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_5 · Cited by 862
Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive.
Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.347 · Cited by 808
Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528 · Cited by 586
Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.478 · Cited by 559
The experience of sexual desire: Psychological correlates in a college sample
Beck, J. G., Bozman, A. W., & Qualtrough, T. (1991) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499109551618 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Attachment and daily sexual goals: A study of dating couples
IMPETT, E. A., GORDON, A. M., & STRACHMAN, A. (2008) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00204.x · Cited by 114
Self-citationKatz, J., & Tirone, V. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9566-4 · Cited by 95
Sexual Motives: Cultural, Evolutionary, and Social Psychological Perspectives
Hatfield, E., Luckhurst, C., & Rapson, R. L. (2010) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-010-9072-z · Cited by 62
Psychosocial Factors in Vulvodynia
Bergeron, S., & Rosen, N. O. (2020) · Female Sexual Pain Disorders · doi:10.1002/9781119482598.ch11 · Cited by 9
MacDonald, T. K., Wood, V., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2578 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Impett, E. A., & Peplau, L. A.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 360-370
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2114124731
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
