CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,678Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.

Collins, Nancy L., Read, Stephen J.·1990·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to examine the correlates of adult attachment. In Study 1, an 18-item scale to measure adult attachment style dimensions was developed based on Kazan and Shaver's (1987) categorical measure. Factor analyses revealed three dimensions underlying this measure: the extent to which an individual is comfortable with closeness, feels he or she can depend on others, and is anxious or fearful about such things as being abandoned or unloved. Study 2 explored the relation between these attachment dimensions and working models of self and others. Attachment dimensions were found to be related to self-esteem, expressiveness, instrumentality, trust in others, beliefs about human nature, and styles of loving. Study 3 explored the role of attachment style dimensions in three aspects of ongoing dating relationships: partner matching on attachment dimensions; similarity between the attachment of one's partner and caregiving style of one's parents; and relationship quality, including communication, trust, and satisfaction. Evidence was obtained for partner matching and for similarity between one's partner and one's parents, particularly for one's opposite-sex parent. Dimensions of attachment style were strongly related to how each partner perceived the relationship, although the dimension of attachment that best predicted quality differed for men and women. For women, the extent to which their partner was comfortable with closeness was the best predictor of relationship quality, whereas the best predictor for men was the extent to which their partner was anxious about being abandoned or unloved. It is generally believed that the nature and quality of one's close relationships in adulthood are strongly influenced by affective events that took place during childhood, particularly within the child-caretaker relationship. Yet, only recently have social psychologists begun to integrate work on adult love relationships with developmental theory and research on the nature and functioning of parent-child relations (Hartup & Rubin, 1986; Kazan & Shaver, 1987;Hinde, 1979;HindeS Shaver & Hazan, 1988; Shaver, Hazan, & Bradshaw, 1988; Shaver R Weiss, 1982,1986). Of particular interest has been the extent to which a child's early attachment relationships with caretakers shape important beliefs about the self and social world, which then guide relationships in adulthood. Recently, Hazan and Shaver (1987) have used infant attachment theory (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978; Bowlby, 1982,1973,1980) as a framework for examining how adult love relationships are related to early parent-child interactions. The

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the original validation studies, the AAS subscale internal consistency coefficients ranged from α = .78 to α = .85 across three samples.

    “In the original validation studies, internal consistency coefficients for the subscales ranged from α = .78to α = .85across three samples (Collins & Read, 1990).”

    From Childhood and Adult Playfulness: Links with Well-Being and Interpersonal Relationships (2026) · cites this paper as Collins & Read, 1990

  • The BFPE is validated based on a German translation of the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS).

    “A validation is based on a German translation of the “Adult Attachment Scale” (AAS [54]),.”

    From Social media addiction: associations with attachment style, mental distress, and personality (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

  • Insecure attachment styles are associated with low self-esteem and therefore potential predictors of problematic cell-phone use.

    “There is evidence that insecure attachment styles are associated with low self-esteem (151, 152) and, therefore, potential predictors of problematic cell-phone use (127).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [151]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1990
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
644-663
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
OpenAlex
W2120002440
Cited by
3,678
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 162 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 165 · 2013: 169 · 2012: 162
FWCI
37.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment styles, dating relationships, relationship quality, partner matching, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, self-esteem, interpersonal trust, gender differences, close relationships, relationship satisfaction, relationship communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Courtship, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Love, Male, Models, Psychological, Object Attachment, Personality Development, Personality Inventory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review