Cited by 38Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyQualitative Research Methods and EthicsGender and Feminist Studies

2002 Carolyn Sherif Award Address: Gender, Race, and Generation in a Midwest High School: Using Ethnographically Informed Methods in Psychology

Stewart, Abigail J.·2003·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

Abigail Stewart Sherif Award Citation. For your exceptional contributions to feminist psychology, the Society for the Psychology of Women presents to you the Carolyn Wood Sherif Award. Your entire career has been marked by distinction; you have been as prolific in publishing as you have been in mentoring. You have illuminated women's lives, their personalities, their development, and their adaptation to change. You have advanced feminist theory, and your academic leadership has created the opportunity for students to do graduate work in feminist psychology. We honor you and your work with gratitude. In this essay I make two arguments. First, I argue for the value of ethnographically informed methods in psychology in general and particularly for the psychology of women. Second, I argue for the importance of the role of generation in psychology, perhaps particularly in the study of values and social identities. In advancing these arguments, I draw on evidence from an ongoing, ethnographically informed study of the graduates of a Midwestern high school in the mid-1950s and late 1960s. The two generations of graduates have distinctive accounts of their experiences, with the older generation's accounts consistent across gender and race, and the younger generation's accounts inflected by both race and gender. Differences in the form of generational identity in the two cohorts are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of historical or sociocultural life-course events on individual development has been an important focus of work by social psychologists such as Elder, Stewart, and Helson and Moane.

    “The impact of such historical or sociocultural life-course events on individual development has been an important focus of the work of social psychologists such as Elder (1974), Stewart (2003), and, to some extent, Helson and Moane (1987).”

    From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Stewart (2003)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Abigail J.
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2003-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2053117417
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
feminist psychology, generational identity, gender, race, high school graduates, generational cohorts, social identity, values, women's lives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review