2002 Carolyn Sherif Award Address: Gender, Race, and Generation in a Midwest High School: Using Ethnographically Informed Methods in Psychology
Abstract
Abigail Stewart Sherif Award Citation. For your exceptional contributions to feminist psychology, the Society for the Psychology of Women presents to you the Carolyn Wood Sherif Award. Your entire career has been marked by distinction; you have been as prolific in publishing as you have been in mentoring. You have illuminated women's lives, their personalities, their development, and their adaptation to change. You have advanced feminist theory, and your academic leadership has created the opportunity for students to do graduate work in feminist psychology. We honor you and your work with gratitude. In this essay I make two arguments. First, I argue for the value of ethnographically informed methods in psychology in general and particularly for the psychology of women. Second, I argue for the importance of the role of generation in psychology, perhaps particularly in the study of values and social identities. In advancing these arguments, I draw on evidence from an ongoing, ethnographically informed study of the graduates of a Midwestern high school in the mid-1950s and late 1960s. The two generations of graduates have distinctive accounts of their experiences, with the older generation's accounts consistent across gender and race, and the younger generation's accounts inflected by both race and gender. Differences in the form of generational identity in the two cohorts are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The impact of historical or sociocultural life-course events on individual development has been an important focus of work by social psychologists such as Elder, Stewart, and Helson and Moane.
“The impact of such historical or sociocultural life-course events on individual development has been an important focus of the work of social psychologists such as Elder (1974), Stewart (2003), and, to some extent, Helson and Moane (1987).”
From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Stewart (2003)
Cites
College-educated women's personality development in adulthood: Perceptions and age differences.
Zucker, A. N., Ostrove, J. M., & Stewart, A. J. (2002) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.236 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Pennak, S. (2005) · Research in Human Development · doi:10.1080/15427609.2005.9683344 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stewart, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stewart, Abigail J.
- ORCID
- Stewart, Abigail J.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2053117417
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist psychology, generational identity, gender, race, high school graduates, generational cohorts, social identity, values, women's lives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review