Absent yet popular? Explaining news visibility of Members of the European Parliament
Open accessAbstract
Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) represent their citizens in European Union policy making, having the power to approve, amend or reject the near majority of legislation. The media inform EU citizens about their representatives and are able to hold them publicly accountable. However, we know little about whether, and to what extent, MEPs are visible in the news. This study investigates the visibility of MEPs in national broadsheets in Britain, France, the Netherlands, Germany and Italy. It seeks to explain individual‐level variation by employing an original dataset of news visibility of 302 MEPs over a period of 25 months (September 2009–September 2011) and tests the applicability of the news values and mirror theories in the context of supranational politics. The results show that political office, length of tenure and domestic party leadership have a positive effect. Legislative activities have a mixed effect on MEP news visibility. Attendance negatively affects news visibility, while non‐attached MEPs receive more news coverage. In short, despite the core supranational nature of EP legislative politics, MEP news visibility primarily depends on journalists’ domestic considerations. This informs both our understanding of MEP parliamentary behaviour and journalism studies in the context of the EU.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data
Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557825 · Cited by 6,865 · see citing works
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336500200104 · Cited by 3,428 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns
Ward, O. (2017) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161216673195 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gattermann, K., & Vasilopoulou, S.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gattermann, Katjana
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 121-140
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W1558293324
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- handle.uba.uva.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Political Research (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Department of Politics, University of York (n/a)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- Members of the European Parliament, news visibility, media coverage of politicians, news values, mirror theory, supranational politics, parliamentary conduct, legislative activity, political office, party leadership, European Union politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review