Cited by 14Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyEuropean Union Policy and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A compromising mindset? How citizens evaluate the trade‐offs in coalition politics

Open access
Green‐Pedersen, Christoffer, Hjermitslev, Ida B.·2024·European Journal of Political Research

Abstract

Coalition building depends on citizens having a ‘compromising mindset’: they must accept that parties need to compromise in order to gain influence and that this entails deviating from the original policy positions. In this study, we show that European citizens understand that compromise is essential for democratic governance and that they, holding everything else constant, prefer political parties that express a willingness to compromise. This finding appears to be independent from specific forms of coalition politics and to be widespread across different levels of political interest, formal education and even ideological extremity. Our analysis compares observational data from the Austrian National Election Survey (AUTNES) 2020 and an original survey from Denmark in 2021. We also present results from a conjoint experiment fielded in Denmark, which evaluates the effect of willingness to compromise on vote choice. Our finding is good news for European democracies where coalition politics and thus compromise is a necessity for governance. Yet, for vote‐seeking politics, the situation is complex as citizens might sometimes punish parties for compromising, but sometimes also punish them for not compromising.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-6765.12631

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Aichholzer J. Partheymüller J. Wagner M. Kritzinger S. Plescia C. Eberl J.‐M. Meyer T. Berk N. Büttner N. Boomgaarden H.&Müller W. C.(2020).“10096_mr_en_v1_0.pdf” AUTNES Online Panel Study 2017‐2019 (SUF edition) https://doi.org/10.11587/QDETRI/AVPTWT AUSSDA V1 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/pan.2022.16 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01370.x · DOI
  4. 10.1086/708629 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/oso/9780198868484.003.0005 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.007 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/693369 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/9781108877053 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/1475-6765.12094 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0003055420000763 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00623.x · DOI
  12. 10.1017/XPS.2017.2 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/688678 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S1537592710003270 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/lsq.12048 · DOI
  16. Hjermitslev I. B., 2020, The electoral cost of coalition participation: Can anyone escape?, Party Politics, 26, 510
  17. 10.1111/1475-6765.12537 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.10.007 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/ajps.12481 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11109-016-9379-z · DOI
  21. 10.1086/708239 · DOI
  22. Laver M., 1990, Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe
  23. 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.004 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S0003055420000337 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/978-3-658-29558-5_5 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/1475-6765.12377 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.08.001 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/oso/9780198868484.003.0003 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/17457289.2016.1270286 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1354068819827513 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1475-6765.12450 · DOI
  32. Schneider C. J., 2019, The responsive union: National elections and European governance
  33. 10.1111/ssqu.12813 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/1475-6765.12169 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/oso/9780197510490.001.0001 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Green‐Pedersen, C., & Hjermitslev, I. B.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Hjermitslev, Ida B.
Venue
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2024-05
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
539-555
ISSN
  • 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6765
OpenAlex
W4388112753
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Political Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Universität Wien
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
Keywords
coalition politics, compromise, willingness to compromise, party evaluation, vote choice, political parties, policy positions, European democracy, political interest, Austria, Denmark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A compromising mindset? How citizens evaluate the trade‐offs in coalition politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6765.12631
The paper
Green‐Pedersen, C., & Hjermitslev, I. B. (2024). A compromising mindset? How citizens evaluate the trade‐offs in coalition politics. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12631