The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical Expenditures during the Last Year of Life: Findings from the 1992–1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey
Open accessAbstract
Objective. To compare medical expenditures for the elderly (65 years old) over the last year of life with those for nonterminal years. Data Source. From the 1992–1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) data from about ten thousand elderly persons each year. Study Design. Medical expenditures for the last year of life and nonterminal years by source of payment and type of care were estimated using robust covariance linear model approaches applied to MCBS data. Data Collection. The MCBS is a panel survey of a complex weighted multilevel random sample of Medicare beneficiaries. A structured questionnaire is administered at four‐month intervals to collect all medical costs by payer and service. Medicare costs are validated by claims records. Principal Findings. From 1992 to 1996, mean annual medical expenditures (1996 dollars) for persons aged 65 and older were $37,581 during the last year of life versus $7,365 for nonterminal years. Mean total last‐year‐of‐life expenditures did not differ greatly by age at death. However, non‐Medicare last‐year‐of‐life expenditures were higher and Medicare last‐year‐of‐life expenditures were lower for those dying at older ages. Last‐year‐of‐life expenses constituted 22 percent of all medical, 26 percent of Medicare, 18 percent of all non‐Medicare expenditures, and 25 percent of Medicaid expenditures. Conclusions. While health services delivered near the end of life will continue to consume large portions of medical dollars, the portion paid by non‐Medicare sources will likely rise as the population ages. Policies promoting improved allocation of resources for end‐of‐life care may not affect non‐Medicare expenditures, which disproportionately support chronic and custodial care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of Life
Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199402243300806 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: Bringing death back into life
Sallnow, L., Smith, R., Ahmedzai, S. H., Bhadelia, A., Chamberlain, C., Cong, Y., Doble, B., Dullie, L., Durie, R., Finkelstein, E. A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02314-x · Cited by 807
Klingler, C., in der Schmitten, J., & Marckmann, G. (2016) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216315601346 · Cited by 201
Dementia incidence may increase more slowly after age 90: Results from the Bronx Aging Study
Hall, C. B., Verghese, J., Sliwinski, M., Chen, Z., Katz, M., Derby, C., & Lipton, R. B. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000176053.98907.3f · Cited by 68
Min, L., Wenger, N., Walling, A. M., Blaum, C., Cigolle, C., Ganz, D. A., Reuben, D., Shekelle, P., Roth, C., & Kerr, E. A. (2013) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12160 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoover, D. R., Crystal, S., Kumar, R., Sambamoorthi, U., & Cantor, J. C.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1625-1642
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- OpenAlex
- W2121249260
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Expenditures during the Last Year of Life: Findings from the 1992–1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6773.01113
- The paper
- Hoover, D. R., Crystal, S., Kumar, R., Sambamoorthi, U., & Cantor, J. C. (2002). Medical Expenditures during the Last Year of Life: Findings from the 1992–1996 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.01113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.