The Health IT Regional Extension Center Program: Evolution and Lessons for Health Care Transformation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Assess the Regional Extension Center (REC) program's progress toward its goal of supporting over 100,000 providers in small, rural, and underserved practices to achieve meaningful use (MU) of an electronic health record (EHR). Data Sources/Study Setting: Data collected January 2010 through June 2013 via monitoring and evaluation of the 4‐year REC program. Study Design: Descriptive study of 62 REC programs. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Primary data collected from REC s were merged with nine other datasets, and descriptive statistics of progress by practice setting and penetration of targeted providers were calculated. Principal Findings: REC s recruited almost 134,000 primary care providers (PCP s), or 44 percent of the nation's PCP s; 86 percent of these were using an EHR with advanced functionality and almost half (48 percent) have demonstrated MU. Eighty‐three percent of Federally Qualified Health Centers and 78 percent of the nation's Critical Access Hospitals were participating with an REC. Conclusions: REC s have made substantial progress in assisting PCP s with adoption and MU of EHR s. This infrastructure supports small practices, community health centers, and rural and public hospitals to use technology for care delivery transformation and improvement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Regional Health IT Extension Center program helped over 100,000 primary care providers in small practices adopt EHRs.
“The Regional Health IT Extension Center program-a nationwide initiative which helped over 100,000 primary care providers in small practices adopt EHRs, 11 and lay the technologybased foundation for success in value-based care.”
From The Paradox of Size: How Small, Independent Practices Can Thrive in Value-Based Care (2016) · cites this paper as [11]
The Results report that RECs enrolled 133,922 primary care providers overall and assisted with EHR adoption. But the Results’ practice-setting breakdown lists only 48,765 providers in small primary care practices, so it does not support the claim that over 100,000 were in small practices. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Triple Aim: Care, Health, And Cost
Berwick, D. M., Nolan, T. W., & Whittington, J. (2008) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759 · Cited by 5,136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Baskerville, N. B., C. Liddy, and W. Hogg. 2012. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analy- sis of Practice Facilitation within Primary Care Settings." Annals Family Medicine 10 (1): 63-74.
- Birkhaeuser, D., R. E. Evenson, and G. Feder. 1991. "The Economic Impact of Agricul- tural Extension: A Review." Economic Development and Cultural Change 39 (3): 607-50.
- Blumenthal, D. 2010. "Launching HITECH." New England Journal of Medicine 362 (5): 382-5.
- -------. 2011a. Wiring the Health System-Origins and Provisions of a New Federal Program. New England Journal of Medicine 365 (24): 2323-9.
- Buntin, M. B., S. H. Jain, and D. Blumenthal. 2010. "Health Information Technology: Laying the Infrastructure for National Health Reform." Health Affairs 29 (6): 1214-9.
- DesRoches, C. M., E. G. Campbell, S. R. Rao, K. Donelan, T. G. Ferris, A. Jha, R. Kaushal, D. E. Levy, S. Rosenbaum, A. E. Shields, and D. Blumenthal. 2008. "Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care-A National Survey of Physi- cians." New England Journal of Medicine 359 (1): 50-60.
- Jha, A., C. ResRoches, P. Kralovec, and M. Joshi. 2010. "A Progress Report of Elec- tronic Health Records in US Hospitals." Health Affairs 29 (10): 1951-7.
- Kramer, M., and J. Kania. 2011. "Collective Impact." Stanford Social Innovation Review 57: 36-41.
- Maxson, E., S. Jain, M. Kendall, F. Mostashari, and D. Blumenthal. 2010. "The Regio- nal Extension Center Program: Helping Physicians Meaningfully Use Health Information Technology." Annals of Internal Medicine 153 (10): 666.
- Mostashari, F., M. Tripathi, and M. Kendall. 2009. "A Tale of Two Large Community Electronic Health Record Extension Projects." Health Affairs 28 (2): 345-56.
- Nagykaldi, Z., J. W. Mold, and C. B. Aspy. 2005. "Practice Facilitators: A Review of the Literature." Family Medicine-Kansas City 37 (8): 581.
- Nutting, P. A., W. L. Miller, B. F. Crabtree, C. R. Jaen, E. E. Stewart, and K. C. Stange. 2009. "Initial Lessons from the First National Demonstration Project on Practice Transformation to a Patient-Centered Medical Home." Annals of Family Medicine 7 (3): 254-60.
- Nutting, P., B. Crabtree, W. Miller, K. Stange, E. Stewart, and C. Jaen. 2011. "Trans- forming Physician Practices to Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Lessons from the National Demonstration Project." Health Affairs 30 (3): 439-45.
- Phillips, R., A. Kaufman, J. Mold, K. Grumbach, M. Vetter-Smith, A. Berry, and B. Te- evan Burke. 2013. "The Primary Care Extension Program: A Catalyst for Change." Annals of Internal Medicine 11 (2): 173-8.
- Rogers, E. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. Glencoe: Free Press. ISBN 0-612-62843-4.
- Ryan, A. M., T. Bishop, S. Shih, and L. P. Casalino. 2013. "Small Physician Practices in New York Needed Sustained Help to Realize Gains in Quality from Use of Elec- tronic Health Records." Health Affairs 32 (1): 53-62.
- Samantaray, R., V. Njoku, J. Brunner, V. Raghaven, M. Kendall, and S. Shih. 2011. "Promoting Electronic Health Record Adoption among Small Independent Primary Care Practices." American Journal of Managed Care 17 (5): 353-8.
- Samuel, C., J. King, F. Adetosoye, L. Samy, and M. Furukawa. 2013. "Engaging Provid- ers in Underserved Areas to Adopt Electronic Health Records." American Journal of Managed Care 19 (3): 229-34.
- Umali-Deininger, D., D.L. Umali, and L.A. Schwartz. 1994. Public and Private Agricul- tural Extension: Beyond Traditional Frontiers (Vol. 236). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Paradox of Size: How Small, Independent Practices Can Thrive in Value-Based Care
Mostashari, F. (2016) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1899 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationApathy, N. C., Holmgren, A. J., Nong, P., Adler-Milstein, J., & Everson, J. (2025) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae267 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lynch, K., Kendall, M., Shanks, K., Haque, A., Jones, E., Wanis, M. G., Furukawa, M., & Mostashari, F.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lynch, Kimberly
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-21
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1pt2
- Pages
- 421-437
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- PMC
- PMC3925411
- OpenAlex
- W2056313365
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Keywords
- meaningful use, electronic health records, health information technology adoption, primary care providers, rural health care, federally qualified health centers, critical access hospitals, healthcare transformation
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Medically Underserved Area, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care, United States, Program Evaluation, Health Care Reform, Rural Health Services, Electronic Health Records, Small Business, Meaningful Use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review