Using record linkage to improve race data quality for American Indians and Alaska Natives in two Pacific Northwest State Hospital discharge databases
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate and adjust for American Indian and Alaska Native ( AI / AN ) racial misclassification in two hospital discharge datasets in the Pacific Northwest. Data Sources/Study Setting: Oregon (2010‐2011) and Washington (2011) hospital discharge datasets were linked with the Northwest Tribal Registry ( NTR ), a registry of AI / AN individuals who accessed services at Indian health facilities in the Northwest. Study Design: Record linkage was used to match state hospital records to the NTR . A state record was considered misclassified if it matched the NTR and was coded as non‐ AI / AN or missing race data. Effect of misclassification was evaluated by comparing prelinkage and postlinkage, age‐adjusted hospital discharge rates. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Researchers used Link Plus 2.0 software (Atlanta, GA, USA) for linkages and SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA) for statistical analyses. Principal Findings: In Oregon, 55.4 percent of matching records were misclassified (66.5 percent miscoded white, and 22.1 percent were missing race information). In Washington, 44.9 percent of matching records were misclassified (61.8 percent miscoded white, and 32.7 percent were missing race information). Linkage increased ascertainment of AI / AN hospitalizations by 31.8 percent in Oregon and 33.9 percent in Washington. Linkage increased the rate ratio ( RR ) for AI / AN hospitalizations in comparison to non‐Hispanic whites ( NHW ) from 0.81 to 1.07 in Oregon, and from 1.21 to 1.62 in Washington. Conclusion: Correction of race in hospital discharge datasets through linkage with a reference file of known AI / AN individuals is an important first step before analytic research on AI / AN health care in the Pacific Northwest can be accomplished with administrative datasets.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misclassification bias was noted as a problem or potential problem in 18 of the 26 (69%) articles about the plausibility of race/ethnicity data.
“Misclassification bias, that is, incorrect assignment, was noted as a problem or a potential problem in 18 of the 26 (69%) articles about the plausibility of race/ethnicity data.11,13,23–38”
From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Multiple studies recommended comparing and linking data across an individual's record to fill in or correct missing data fields, either to increase completeness and/or to check the accuracy of implausible data.
“This method compares and links data across an individual’s record in order to fill in or correct missing data fields and was recommended by several studies as a way to either increase completeness26,28,49,60,62,64,72 and/or check the accuracy of implausible data.13,26,28”
From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Six studies found disproportionately high rates of misclassification for American Indians in comparison to other racial/ethnic groups; most often, these patients were misidentified as white.
“Six studies found disproportionately high rates of misclassification for American Indians in comparison to other racial/ethnic groups; most often, these patients were misidentified as white.27,28,30,32,41,42”
From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Agreement between administrative data and patients’ self-reports of race/ethnicity
Kressin, N. R., Chang, B.-H., Hendricks, A., & Kazis, L. E. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.10.1734 · Cited by 234 · cited 3× · see citing works
“AI/AN are frequently misclassified in surveillance and administrative data systems, with misclassification ranging from 30 to 70 percent (Kressin et al. 2003; Puuka, Stehr-Green, and Becker 2005; Johnson et al. 2009; Hoopes et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodGomez, S. L., Kelsey, J. L., Glaser, S. L., Lee, M. M., & Sidney, S. (2005) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.03.002 · Cited by 86 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Compared with other race groups, AI/AN have the lowest levels of agreement (approximately 60 percent) between selfreported race and race assigned in medical records (Boehrmer et al. 2002; Kressin et al. 2003; Gomez et al. 2005).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Becker, T., J. Bettles, J. Lapidus, J. Campo, C. J. Johnson, D. Shipley, and L. D. Robert- son. 2002. "Improving Cancer Incidence Estimates for American Indians and Alaska Natives in the Pacific Northwest." American Journal of Public Health 92 (9): 1469-71.
- Bilheimer, L. T., and R. J. Klein. 2010. "Data and Measurement Issues in the Analysis of Health Disparities." Health Services Research 45 (5): 1489-507.
- Boehrmer, U., N. R. Kressin, D. R. Berlowitz, C. L. Christiansen, L. E. Kazis, and J. A. Jones. 2002. "Self-Reported vs. Administrative Race/Ethnicity Data and Study Results." American Journal of Public Health 92 (9): 1471-3.
- Foote, M., J. Matloub, R. Strickland, L. Stephenson, and H. Vaughan-Batten. 2007. "Improving Cancer Incidence Estimates for American Indians in Wisconsin." Wisconsin Medical Journal 106 (4): 196-204.
- Gonzalez, K., A. K. Harding, W. E. Lambert, R. Fu, and W. G. Henderson. 2013. "Per- ceived Experiences of Discrimination in Health Care: A Barrier for Cancer Screening among American Indian Women with Type 2 Diabetes." Women's Health Issues 23 (1): e61-7.
- Hoopes, M., E. Vinson, and K. Lopez. 2012. "Regional Differences and Tribal Use of American Indian/Alaska Native Cancer Data in the Pacific Northwest." Journal of Cancer Education 27 (1): 73-9.
- Hoopes, M. J., M. Taualii, T. M. Weiser, R. Brucker, and T. M. Becker. 2010. "Including Self-Reported Race to Improve Cancer Surveillance Data for American Indians and Alaska Natives in Washington State." Journal of Registry Management 37 (2): 43-8.
- Johnson, J. C., A. S. Soliman, D. Tadgerson, G. E. Copeland, D. A. Seefeld, N. L. Pingatore, R. Haverkate, M. Banerjee, and M. A. Roubidoux. 2009. "Tribal Linkage and Race Data Quality for American Indians in a State Cancer Reg- istry." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 36 (6): 549-54.
- Korenbrot, C. C., S. Ehlers, and J. A. Crouch. 2003. "Disparities in Hospitalizations of Rural American Indians." Medical Care 41 (5): 626-36.
- Puuka, E., P. Stehr-Green, and T. M. Becker. 2005. "Measuring the Health Status Gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives: Getting Closer to the Truth." American Journal of Public Health 95 (5): 838-43.
- Roberts, J., and J. Jones. 2004. "Health Disparities Challenge Public Health among Native Americans." Northwest Public Health 21 (2): 8-9.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review
Cook, L. A., Sachs, J., & Weiskopf, N. G. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab199 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bigback, K. M., Hoopes, M., Dankovchik, J., Knaster, E., Warren‐Mears, V., Joshi, S., & Weiser, T.
- Affiliations
- Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board (US)
- Ochin (US)
- Seattle Indian Health Board (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bigback, Kristyn M.
- Venue
- Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 1390-1402
- ISSN
- 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6773
- PMC
- PMC4545338
- OpenAlex
- W1584531815
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS019972)
- U.S. Public Health Service (AIAMP120012)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- American Indians and Alaska Natives, racial misclassification, data linkage, hospital discharge data, administrative health data, hospitalization rates, Pacific Northwest, Oregon, Washington
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Inuit, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Oregon, Patient Discharge, Registries, Washington, Quality Improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review