Cited by 234Medical Coding and Health InformationRace, Genetics, and SocietyElectronic Health Records Systems

Agreement between administrative data and patients’ self-reports of race/ethnicity

Open access
Kressin, Nancy R., Chang, Bei-Hung, Hendricks, Ann, Kazis, Lewis E.·2003·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We examined agreement of administrative data with self-reported race/ethnicity and identified correlates of agreement. Methods. We used Veterans Affairs administrative data and VA 1999 Large Health survey race/ethnicity data. Results. Relatively low rates of agreement (approximately 60%) between data sources were largely the result of administrative data from patients whose race/ethnicity was unknown, with least agreement for Native American, Asian, and Pacific Islander patients. After exclusion of patients with missing race/ethnicity, agreement improved except for Native Americans. Agreement did not increase substantially after inclusion of data from individuals indicating multiple race/ethnicities. Patients for whom there was better agreement between data sources tended to be less educated, non–solitary living, younger, and White; to have sufficient food; and to use more inpatient Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care. Conclusions. Better reporting of race/ethnicity data will improve agreement between data sources. Previous studies using VA administrative data may have underestimated racial disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.93.10.1734

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies found that the plausibility of patient race/ethnicity information in their dataset was questionable because the data were incomplete; plausibility was low because a patient's race was reported correctly in one area but as 'other' in another.

    “For example, several studies found that the plausibility of the patient race/ethnicity information in their dataset was questionable because the data were incomplete; in other words, plausibility was low because a patient’s race was reported correctly in one area, but as “other” in another.21,86,87”

    From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [86]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Blustein J. The reliability of racial classifications in hospital discharge abstract data. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1018–1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Baumeister L, Marchi K, Pearl M, Williams R, Braveman P. The validity of information of “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:869–883. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Hahn RA, Mulinare J, Teutsch SM. Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants: a new look at infant mortality, 1983 through 1985. JAMA. 1992;267:259–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Pan CX, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Choodnovskiy I, Avom J. Definition of race and ethnicity in older people in Medicare and Medicaid. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:730–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Boehmer U, Kressin N, Berlowitz D, Christiansen C, Kazis L, Jones J. Self-reported vs administrative race/ethnicity data and study results. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1471–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, Lofgren RP. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:621–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Peterson ED, Wright SM, Daley J, Thibault GE. Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;271:1175–1180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Mirvis DM, Burns R, Gaschen L, Cloar FT, Graney M. Variation in utilization of cardiac procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system: effect of race. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1297–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Mickelson JK, Blum CM, Geraci JM. Acute myocardial infarction: clinical characteristics, management and outcome in a metropolitan Veterans Affairs Medical Center teaching hospital. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:915–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Mirvis DM, Graney MJ. Variations in the use of cardiac procedures in the Veterans Health Administration. Am Heart J. 1999;137:706–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Kashner TM. Agreement between administrative files and written medical records: a case of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Med Care. 1998;36:1324–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [15]Ware J, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS. Comparison of methods for the scoring and the statistical analysis of the SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995;33:AS264–AS279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [16]Wolinsky FD, Coe RM, Mosely RM 2nd, Homan SM. Veterans’ and non-veterans’ use of health services: a comparative analysis. Med Care. 1985;23:1358–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kressin, N. R., Chang, B.-H., Hendricks, A., & Kazis, L. E.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2003-10
Volume
93
Issue
10
Pages
1734-1739
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2145841259
Cited by
234
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
race and ethnicity, self-report, administrative data, data source agreement, veterans, racial disparities, Native Americans, sociodemographic correlates
MeSH terms
Demography, Ethnicity, Health Services Research, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Patients, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Public Health Informatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review