Cited by 434Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationCorporate Identity and ReputationCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The Role of Social Media in the Capital Market: Evidence from Consumer Product Recalls

Open access
LEE, LIAN FEN, HUTTON, AMY P., SHU, SUSAN·2015·Journal of Accounting Research

Abstract

We examine how corporate social media affects the capital market consequences of firms’ disclosure in the context of consumer product recalls. Product recalls constitute a “product crisis” exposing the firm to reputational damage, loss of future sales, and legal liability. During such a crisis it is crucial for the firm to quickly and directly communicate its intended message to a wide network of stakeholders, which, in turn, renders corporate social media a potentially useful channel of disclosure. While we document that corporate social media, on average, attenuates the negative price reaction to recall announcements, the attenuation benefits of corporate social media vary with the level of control the firm has over its social media content. In particular, with the arrival of Facebook and Twitter, firms relinquished complete control over their social media content, and the attenuation benefits of corporate social media, while still significant, lessened. Detailed Twitter analysis confirms that the moderating effect of social media varies with the level of firm involvement and with the amount of control exerted by other users: the negative price reaction to a recall is attenuated by the frequency of tweets by the firm, while exacerbated by the frequency of tweets by other users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-679x.12074

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tweet sentiment has been used to predict stock market reactions, collect investor opinions, and analyse social media effects on brands and products.

    “For instance, sentiment expressed in tweets has been used to predict stock market reactions (Azar and Lo 2016), to collect opinions that investors post in social media (Chen et al. 2014) or to analyse the effect that social media posts can have on brands and products (Lee et al. 2015).”

    From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEE, L. F., HUTTON, A. P., & SHU, S.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Venue
Journal of Accounting Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-27
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
367-404
ISSN
  • 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-679X
OpenAlex
W3122743006
Cited by
434
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
88.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Accounting Research (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
corporate social media, price response, corporate disclosure, crisis communication, reputational damage, Facebook, Twitter, user-generated content, stakeholder communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review