The Role of Social Media in the Capital Market: Evidence from Consumer Product Recalls
Open accessAbstract
We examine how corporate social media affects the capital market consequences of firms’ disclosure in the context of consumer product recalls. Product recalls constitute a “product crisis” exposing the firm to reputational damage, loss of future sales, and legal liability. During such a crisis it is crucial for the firm to quickly and directly communicate its intended message to a wide network of stakeholders, which, in turn, renders corporate social media a potentially useful channel of disclosure. While we document that corporate social media, on average, attenuates the negative price reaction to recall announcements, the attenuation benefits of corporate social media vary with the level of control the firm has over its social media content. In particular, with the arrival of Facebook and Twitter, firms relinquished complete control over their social media content, and the attenuation benefits of corporate social media, while still significant, lessened. Detailed Twitter analysis confirms that the moderating effect of social media varies with the level of firm involvement and with the amount of control exerted by other users: the negative price reaction to a recall is attenuated by the frequency of tweets by the firm, while exacerbated by the frequency of tweets by other users.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tweet sentiment has been used to predict stock market reactions, collect investor opinions, and analyse social media effects on brands and products.
“For instance, sentiment expressed in tweets has been used to predict stock market reactions (Azar and Lo 2016), to collect opinions that investors post in social media (Chen et al. 2014) or to analyse the effect that social media posts can have on brands and products (Lee et al. 2015).”
From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media (2019) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2015
Cites
Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9781400829828 · Cited by 9,467 · see citing works
What Makes Online Content Viral?
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353 · Cited by 3,178 · see citing works
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media
Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3161603 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Gatzert, N. (2015) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2015.10.001 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
- Authors
- LEE, L. F., HUTTON, A. P., & SHU, S.
- Affiliations
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-27
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 367-404
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W3122743006
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 88.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Accounting Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Keywords
- corporate social media, price response, corporate disclosure, crisis communication, reputational damage, Facebook, Twitter, user-generated content, stakeholder communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review