Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey

Open access
LOUGHRAN, TIM, MCDONALD, BILL·2016·Journal of Accounting Research

Abstract

Relative to quantitative methods traditionally used in accounting and finance, textual analysis is substantially less precise. Thus, understanding the art is of equal importance to understanding the science. In this survey, we describe the nuances of the method and, as users of textual analysis, some of the tripwires in implementation. We also review the contemporary textual analysis literature and highlight areas of future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-679x.12123

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 2,261

Metadata

Authors
LOUGHRAN, T., & MCDONALD, B.
Venue
Journal of Accounting Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
1187-1230
ISSN
  • 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-679X
OpenAlex
W2625464253
Cited by
2,261
References
6
FWCI
394.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-679x.12123
The paper
LOUGHRAN, T., & MCDONALD, B. (2016). Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.