Cited by 1,760Auditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceAccounting Theory and Financial ReportingFinancial Reporting and XBRL

The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research

LEUZ, CHRISTIAN, WYSOCKI, PETER D.·2016·Journal of Accounting Research

Abstract

This paper discusses the empirical literature on the economic consequences of disclosure and financial reporting regulation, drawing on U.S. and international evidence. Given the policy relevance of research on regulation, we highlight the challenges with (1) quantifying regulatory costs and benefits, (2) measuring disclosure and reporting outcomes, and (3) drawing causal inferences from regulatory studies. Next, we discuss empirical studies that link disclosure and reporting activities to firm‐specific and market‐wide economic outcomes. Understanding these links is important when evaluating regulation. We then synthesize the empirical evidence on the economic effects of disclosure regulation and reporting standards, including the evidence on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption. Several important conclusions emerge. We generally lack evidence on market‐wide effects and externalities from regulation, yet such evidence is central to the economic justification of regulation. Moreover, evidence on causal effects of disclosure and reporting regulation is still relatively rare. We also lack evidence on the real effects of such regulation. These limitations provide many research opportunities. We conclude with several specific suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-679x.12115

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mandatory disclosure regimes can have unintended consequences and are far from being innocuous.

    “Yet, mandatory disclosure regimes can have unintended consequences and are far from being innocuous (see, e.g., Dranove and Jin 2010 and Leuz and Wysocki 2016 for further discussion and examples).”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Leuz and Wysocki 2016

  • Evidence on the causal effects of regulation is still scarce.

    “First, evidence on the causal effects of regulation is still scarce.”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Leuz and Wysocki 2016

  • We typically lack evidence that allows us to perform quantitative cost-benefit analyses for a specific regulatory proposal or act.

    “Second, we typically lack evidence that allows us to perform quantitative cost-benefit analyses for a specific regulatory proposal or act.”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Leuz and Wysocki 2016

  • New regulation does not occur in a vacuum, but interacts with other features of the institutional environment.

    “Third, new regulation does not occur in a vacuum, but interacts with other features of the institutional environment.”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Leuz and Wysocki 2016

  • More and better disclosure can lead to tangible capital-market benefits in the form of improved liquidity, lower cost of capital, higher asset prices (or firm value), and potentially better corporate decisions.

    “The general takeaway from this large literature is that more and better disclosure can lead to tangible capital-market benefits in the form of improved liquidity, lower cost of capital, higher asset prices (or firm value), and potentially better corporate decisions.”

    From Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2021) · cites this paper as Leuz and Wysocki 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEUZ, C., & WYSOCKI, P. D.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Accounting Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
525-622
ISSN
  • 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-679X
OpenAlex
W2336317428
Cited by
1,760
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 241 · 2025: 242 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 135 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
477.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Accounting Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
Keywords
financial reporting regulation, disclosure regulation, regulatory costs and benefits, International Financial Reporting Standards adoption, reporting guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review