The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Economics of salt‐induced land degradation and restoration
Open accessAbstract
Food security concerns and the scarcity of new productive land have put productivity enhancement of degraded lands back on the political agenda. In such a context, salt‐affected lands are a valuable resource that cannot be neglected nor easily abandoned even with their lower crop yields, especially in areas where significant investments have already been made in irrigation and drainage infrastructure. A review of previous studies shows a very limited number of highly variable estimates of the costs of salt‐induced land degradation combined with methodological and contextual differences. Simple extrapolation suggests that the global annual cost of salt‐induced land degradation in irrigated areas could be US$ 27.3 billion because of lost crop production. We present selected case studies that highlight the potential for economic and environmental benefits of taking action to remediate salt‐affected lands. The findings indicate that it can be cost‐effective to invest in sustainable land management in countries confronting salt‐induced land degradation. Such investments in effective remediation of salt‐affected lands should form part of a broader strategy for food security and be defined in national action plans. This broader strategy is required to ensure the identification and effective removal of barriers to the adoption of sustainable land management, such as perverse subsidies. Whereas reversing salt‐induced land degradation would require several years, interim salinity management strategies could provide a pathway for effective remediation and further showcase the importance of reversing land degradation and the rewards of investing in sustainable land management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abdel Latef, A. A. H., Srivastava, A. K., El‐sadek, M. S. A., Kordrostami, M., & Tran, L. P. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2780 · Cited by 365
Opinion: taking phytoremediation from proven technology to accepted practice
Gerhardt, K. E., Gerwing, P. D., & Greenberg, B. M. (2017) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.016 · Cited by 360
Exploring the multiple land degradation pathways across the planet
Prăvălie, R. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103689 · Cited by 322
Ullah, A., Bano, A., & Khan, N. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.618092 · Cited by 295
Quinoa: In Perspective of Global Challenges
Jaikishun, S., Li, W., Yang, Z., & Song, S. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9040176 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Qadir, M., Quillérou, E., Nangia, V., Murtaza, G., Singh, M., Thomas, R. J., Drechsel, P., & Noble, A. D.
- Venue
- Natural Resources Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-28
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 282-295
- ISSN
- 0165-0203 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-8947
- OpenAlex
- W2170874734
- Cited by
- 1,335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economics of salt‐induced land degradation and restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1477-8947.12054
- The paper
- Qadir, M., Quillérou, E., Nangia, V., Murtaza, G., Singh, M., Thomas, R. J., Drechsel, P., & Noble, A. D. (2014). Economics of salt‐induced land degradation and restoration. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.