Cited by 50Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Comparison of Effects of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta and Cyclosporin A on Antigen-Presenting Cells of Blood and Epidermis

Open access
Demidem, Aicha, Taylor, J. Richard, Grammer, Susan F., Streilein, J. Wayne·1991·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

The antigen-processing and -presenting functions of freshly obtained epidermal Langerhans cells (fresh LC) and 72-h cultured Langerhans cells (cultured LC) differ remarkably. It has been proposed that the disparate functional programs revealed in vitro may correspond directly with distinct in vivo physiologic functions--fresh LC are the in vitro equivalent of intraepidermal LC and cultured LC are equivalent to LC that have migrated from skin to the draining lymph node. As an approach to studying this proposal, we have compared the effects of two immunosuppressive agents, cyclosporin A (CsA) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta), on the alloantigen-presenting capabilities of fresh LC, cultured LC, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). CsA pretreatment (1 and 10 mu/ml x 2 h) profoundly inhibited alloantigen presentation by fresh LC, cultured LC, and PBMC. By contrast, TGF beta pretreatment (1 and 10 ng/ml x 2 h) inhibited presentation by PBMC and cultured LC, but not by fresh LC. The resistance of fresh LC to the deleterious effects of TGF beta is discussed in terms of the possibility that TGF beta may inhibit antigen processing following conventional endocytosis. We suggest that fresh, but not cultured, LC escape TGF beta effects because they possess an "alternative" endocytic pathway, marked by the presence of Birbeck granules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12469761

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TGF-β lowers reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide, which macrophages need for their destructive functions.

    “TGF-β also suppresses reactive oxygen species and NO production, which is required for the destructive properties of macrophages178,179.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [179]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demidem, A., Taylor, J. R., Grammer, S. F., & Streilein, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
401-407
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083155488
Cited by
50
References
45
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ai022072-08)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 22072)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
Langerhans cells, antigen presentation, TGF-beta, cyclosporine, immunosuppression, epidermis, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, alloantigen, antigen processing, endocytosis, Birbeck granules, skin-draining lymph nodes
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Blood Cells, Cyclosporins, Humans, Langerhans Cells, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed, T-Lymphocytes, Transforming Growth Factor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review