The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skin Permeability In Vivo: Comparison in Rat, Rabbit, Pig and Man
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The chemistry and biological activities of N-acetylcysteine
Samuni, Y., Goldstein, S., Dean, O. M., & Berk, M. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.04.016 · Cited by 876
Animal models of skin disease for drug discovery
Avci, P., Sadasivam, M., Gupta, A., De Melo, W. C., Huang, Y.-Y., Yin, R., Chandran, R., Kumar, R., Otufowora, A., Nyame, T., et al. (2013) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2013.761202 · Cited by 130
“Human and animal skins vary in many aspects; for example, percutaneous absorption of certain topical drugs is different among rabbits, rats, and pigs [3].”
BackgroundBARBER, E. (1992) · Fundamental and Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0272-0590(92)90086-w · Cited by 119
Wester, R. C., Melendres, J., Sedik, L., Maibach, H., & Riviere, J. E. (1998) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/taap.1998.8434 · Cited by 118
Self-citationSkin absorption and human risk assessment
Poet, T. S., & McDougal, J. N. (2002) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00013-3 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartek, M. J., Labudde, J. A., & Maibach, H. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1972-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 114-123
- ISSN
- 0022-202X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074393092
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skin Permeability In Vivo: Comparison in Rat, Rabbit, Pig and Man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12538909
- The paper
- Bartek, M. J., Labudde, J. A., & Maibach, H. I. (1972). Skin Permeability In Vivo: Comparison in Rat, Rabbit, Pig and Man. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12538909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
