Cited by 47Skin Protection and AgingImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Effects of ultraviolet radiation on murine epidermal Langerhans cells: Doses of ultraviolet radiation that modulate ICAM-1 (CD54) expression and inhibit Langerhans cell function cause delayed cytotoxicity in vitro

Open access
Tang, Aimin., Udey, Mark C·1992·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Low doses (100 J/m2) of ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation from sunlamp fluorescent FS20 tubes inhibit the ability of freshly isolated murine epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) to support anti-CD3 MoAb-induced T-cell mitogenesis and selectively inhibit the upregulation of ICAM-1 expression by LC without causing appreciable cytotoxicity in short-term (less than or equal to 24 h) incubations (J Immunol 146:3347-3355, 1991). In the present study, epidermal cells (EC) were exposed to UVB radiation or were sham-irradiated and cultured for 24, 48, or 72 h when LC were recovered, enumerated, and assayed for simultaneous expression of I-A antigens and ICAM-1 by flow cytometry. UVB-irradiated LC that had been cultured for 24 h exhibited levels of I-A antigens comparable to those on unirradiated LC but expressed substantially less ICAM-1. After 48 and 72 h, cultured UVB-irradiated LC expressed somewhat lower levels of I-A antigens and markedly less ICAM-1 than unirradiated controls. Although similar numbers of LC were recovered from cultures initiated with UVB-irradiated and unirradiated epidermal cells after 24 h, far fewer identifiable LC were recovered from cultures seeded with irradiated cells at 48 and 72 h (approximately 50 and approximately 10% of control, respectively). The effect of UVB radiation on the survival of LC in vitro was not reversible with exogenous TNF alpha (125 U/ml) alone or granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (5 ng/ml) and IL-1 (50 U/ml) in combination, al…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12611871

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, A., & Udey, M. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
83-89
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091357966
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
UV-B radiation, Langerhans cells, epidermal Langerhans cells, ICAM-1, Ia antigens, T cell mitogenesis, anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, TNF-α, GM-CSF, interleukin-1
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Cell Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Langerhans Cells, Mice, Inbred BALB C, PUVA Therapy, Ultraviolet Rays, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cytokines, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review