Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological Control and Autonomy Granting: Opposite Ends of a Continuum or Distinct Constructs?

Silk, Jennifer S., Morris, Amanda S., Kanaya, Tomoe, Steinberg, Laurence·2003·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between parental psychological control and parental autonomy granting, and the relations between these constructs and indicators of adolescent psychosocial functioning, in a sample of 9,564 adolescents from grades 9 to 12. Participants completed a comprehensive parenting questionnaire as well as several measures of psychosocial adjustment. Confirmatory factor analyses of the parenting items revealed discrete factors for psychological control and autonomy granting, suggesting that these are distinct parenting constructs rather than opposite ends of a parental control continuum. Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that these factors were weakly correlated and differentially related to adolescent internalizing symptoms. Findings have implications for future conceptualization and measurement of psychological control and autonomy granting, and for research examining their effects on adolescent development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1532-7795.1301004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.458 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.458
  2. Arbuckle J. L., 1995, AMOS for Windows: Analysis of moment structures
  3. Barber B. K., 2001, Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents, 263
  4. Barber B. K., 2001, Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents, 15
  5. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.86 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.65.1.86
  6. Morris A. S., 2001, Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents, 125
  7. 10.1037/0022-006X.58.4.385 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rodgers R. R., 1966, Cornell parent behavior description—An interim report.
  9. Steinberg L., 1991, Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across various ecological niches, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 19

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Silk, J. S., Morris, A. S., Kanaya, T., & Steinberg, L.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-13
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
113-128
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W2081048580
Cited by
448
References
38
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Control and Autonomy Granting: Opposite Ends of a Continuum or Distinct Constructs? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1532-7795.1301004
The paper
Silk, J. S., Morris, A. S., Kanaya, T., & Steinberg, L. (2003). Psychological Control and Autonomy Granting: Opposite Ends of a Continuum or Distinct Constructs? Journal of Research on Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.