Cited by 355Risk Perception and ManagementSocial Capital and NetworksClimate Change Communication and Perception

A Social Network Contagion Theory of Risk Perception

Scherer, Clifford W., Cho, Hichang·2003·Risk Analysis

Abstract

Risk perceptions have, to a great extent, been studied exclusively as individual cognitive mechanisms in which individuals collect, process, and form perceptions as atomized units unconnected to a social system. These individual‐level theories do not, however, help explain how perception of risk may vary between communities or within a single community. One alternative approach is based on a network theory of contagion. This approach, emerging largely from organizational and community social network studies, suggests that it is the relational aspects of individuals and the resulting networks and self‐organizing systems that influence individual perceptions and build “groups or communities of like‐minded” individuals. These social units, it is argued, behave as attitude, knowledge, or behavioral structures. The study reported in this article tests one aspect of this theoretical perspective. The central hypothesis proposes the existence of risk perception networks—relational groupings of individuals who share, and perhaps create, similar risk perceptions. To test this idea, data were collected from individuals involved in a community environmental conflict over a hazardous waste site cleanup. The statistical analysis used a matrix of relational social linkages to compare with a matrix of individual risk perceptions. The analysis confirmed the hypothesis suggesting that social linkages in communities may play an important role in focusing risk perceptions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1539-6924.00306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social support during disasters is a further central part of local disaster resilience.

    “Social support during disasters is a further central part of local disaster resilience. Social support includes daily exchange and social networks with others (Scherer and Cho 2003; Djalante et al. 2020) and the acquisition of volunteers.”

    From Disaster preparedness and resilience at household level in Yangon, Myanmar (2022) · cites this paper as Scherer and Cho 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherer, C. W., & Cho, H.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Scherer, Clifford W.
Venue
Risk Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
261-267
ISSN
  • 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-6924
OpenAlex
W2009790751
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Risk Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
Keywords
risk perception, social networks, contagion theory, social links, hazardous waste cleanup, community risk perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review