Gadamer and The Author's Authority: A Language-Game Approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both Gadamer and Wittgenstein see language as deeply culturally and contextually conditioned and a shared medium of understanding.
“Both thinkers see language as deeply culturally and contextually conditioned and a shared medium of understanding (Connolly, 1986).”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Connolly, 1986
This view of language is very close to how Gadamer views language.
“Coincidentally, this view of language is very close to how Gadamer views language.”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Connolly, 1986
The argument that Gadamer's and Wittgenstein's thinking is compatible is based on established work.
“The argument is based on established work (Connolly, 1986; see also Paper 2), but research might reveal that there are aspects to their thinking that would be difficult to reconcile.”
From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Connolly, 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games
Arjoranta, J. (2018) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/uep74 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- CONNOLLY, J. M.
- Corresponding author
- CONNOLLY, JOHN M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-03-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-278
- ISSN
- 0021-8529 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6245
- OpenAlex
- W4232601204
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Keywords
- Hans-Georg Gadamer, language games, hermeneutics, authorship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
