Cited by 241Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Relationship between the different aspects related to coffee quality and their volatile compounds

Toledo, Paulo R.A.B., Pezza, Leonardo, Pezza, Helena R., Toci, Aline T.·2016·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

This paper provides, for the first time, an overview of different aspects related to the quality of coffee beans and their volatile fractions: species/cultivars, geographic origins, bean defects, and types of beverages, processing, roasting, and storage. In other words, it concerns the complex relation between the quality of coffee seeds and their volatile components. It is an overview of 48 articles and considering 6 different aspects related to the quality of coffee and its aromatic fraction. The greatest numbers of published papers concerned "species and cultivars" and "defective seeds," both with 11 articles cited, followed by "storage" with 10 articles. Many aspects still require greater clarification, including the effects of geographical origin, processing, and roasting. Other issues that are better understood include the effects of species type, defective seeds, and storage conditions. Another topic that has received very little attention is the question of the existence of many different coffee cultivars within each species, which we believe should be further investigated, given that this can significantly affect the quality of the final beverage. Meanwhile, with the growing technological development in the areas of science and agriculture, there are many other aspects to be studied (or revisited), and the field of the aromatic quality of coffee provides ample opportunity for scientific investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1541-4337.12205

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toledo, P. R. A. B., Pezza, L., Pezza, H. R., & Toci, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana (BR)
Corresponding author
Toci, Aline T.
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
705-719
ISSN
1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337172894
Cited by
241
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq)
  • Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
coffee quality, volatile compounds, coffee aroma, coffee beans, coffee varieties, coffee species, geographical origin, coffee processing, coffee roasting, coffee storage, coffee beverages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review