The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Residential Bacteria on Surfaces in the Food Industry and Their Implications for Food Safety and Quality
Abstract
Surface hygiene is commonly measured as a part of the quality system of food processing plants, but as the bacteria present are commonly not identified, their roles for food quality and safety are not known. Here, we review the identity of residential bacteria and characteristics relevant for survival and growth in the food industry along with potential implications for food safety and quality. Sampling after cleaning and disinfection increases the likelihood of targeting residential bacteria. The increasing use of sequencing technologies to identify bacteria has improved knowledge about the bacteria present in food premises. Overall, nonpathogenic Gram‐negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas spp., followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. dominate on food processing surfaces. Pseudomonas spp. persistence is likely due to growth at low temperatures, biofilm formation, tolerance to biocides, and low growth requirements. Gram‐positive bacteria are most frequently found in dairies and in dry production environments. The residential bacteria may end up in the final products through cross‐contamination and may affect food quality. Such effects can be negative and lead to spoilage, but the bacteria may also contribute positively, as through spontaneous fermentation. Pathogenic bacteria present in food processing environments may interact with residential bacteria, resulting in both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on pathogens in multispecies biofilms. The residential bacterial population, or bacteriota, does not seem to be an important source for the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes to humans, but more knowledge is needed to verify this. If residential bacteria occur in high numbers, they may influence processes such as membrane filtration and corrosion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance
McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.1.147 · Cited by 4,780
Meyer, F., Paarmann, D., D'Souza, M., Olson, R., Glass, E., Kubal, M., Paczian, T., Rodriguez, A., Stevens, R., Wilke, A., et al. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 · Cited by 3,565
How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review
Kramer, A., Schwebke, I., & Kampf, G. (2006) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-130 · Cited by 2,504
Microbiological Safety and Quality of Food
Lund, B. M., Baird-Parker, T. C., & Gould, G. W. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,144
Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcal Food-Borne Disease: An Ongoing Challenge in Public Health
Kadariya, J., Smith, T. C., & Thapaliya, D. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/827965 · Cited by 863
Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria
Funke, G., von Graevenitz, A., Clarridge, J. E., & Bernard, K. A. (1997) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.10.1.125 · Cited by 836
Recent advances in cheese microbiology
Beresford, T. P., Fitzsimons, N. A., Brennan, N. L., & Cogan, T. M. (2001) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/s0958-6946(01)00056-5 · Cited by 823
Review — Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises
Carpentier, B., & Cerf, O. (2011) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.005 · Cited by 800
Cited by
Microbial Biofilms in the Food Industry—A Comprehensive Review
Carrascosa, C., Raheem, D., Ramos, F., Saraiva, A., & Raposo, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042014 · Cited by 459
Komodromos, D., Kotzamanidis, C., Giantzi, V., Pappa, S., Papa, A., Zdragas, A., Angelidis, A., & Sergelidis, D. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11111370 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Møretrø, T., & Langsrud, S.
- Venue
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1022-1041
- ISSN
- 1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2741453780
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 135
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residential Bacteria on Surfaces in the Food Industry and Their Implications for Food Safety and Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1541-4337.12283
- The paper
- Møretrø, T., & Langsrud, S. (2017). Residential Bacteria on Surfaces in the Food Industry and Their Implications for Food Safety and Quality. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.