Cited by 811Nanocomposite Films for Food PackagingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Food packaging: A comprehensive review and future trends

Han, Jia‐Wei, Ruiz‐Garcia, Luis, Qian, Jian‐Ping, Yang, Xin‐Ting·2018·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

Innovations in food packaging systems will help meet the evolving needs of the market, such as consumer preference for “healthy” and high‐quality food products and reduction of the negative environmental impacts of food packaging. Emerging concepts of active and intelligent packaging technologies provide numerous innovative solutions for prolonging shelf‐life and improving the quality and safety of food products. There are also new approaches to improving the passive characteristics of food packaging, such as mechanical strength, barrier performance, and thermal stability. The development of sustainable or green packaging has the potential to reduce the environmental impacts of food packaging through the use of edible or biodegradable materials, plant extracts, and nanomaterials. Active, intelligent, and green packaging technologies can work synergistically to yield a multipurpose food‐packaging system with no negative interactions between components, and this aim can be seen as the ultimate future goal for food packaging technology. This article reviews the principles of food packaging and recent developments in different types of food packaging technologies. Global patents and future research trends are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1541-4337.12343

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, J., Ruiz‐Garcia, L., Qian, J., & Yang, X.
Affiliations
  • National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture Room 1017, Building A, Beijing Nongke Masion, 11# Shuguang Huayuan Middle Road, Haidian District Beijing 100097 China
  • Dept. de Ingeniería Agroforestal. E.T.S.I. Agronómica, Alimentaria y Biosistemas, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid 28040 Spain
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
860-877
ISSN
1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804888451
Cited by
811
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 3
FWCI
17.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671593)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
food packaging, active packaging, smart packaging, sustainable packaging, edible packaging, biodegradable packaging, nanomaterials, plant extracts, shelf life extension, food safety, barrier properties, mechanical strength, thermal stability, environmental impact of packaging, patents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review