The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flavor challenges in extruded plant‐based meat alternatives: A review
Open accessAbstract
Demand for plant‐based meat alternatives has increased in recent years due to concerns about health, ethics, the environment, and animal welfare. Nevertheless, the market share of plant‐based meat alternatives must increase significantly if they are to support sustainable food production and consumption. Flavor is an important limiting factor of the acceptability and marketability of plant‐based meat alternatives. Undesirable chemosensory perceptions, such as a beany flavor, bitter taste, and astringency, are often associated with plant proteins and products that use them. This study reviewed 276 articles to answer the following five research questions: (1) What are the volatile and nonvolatile compounds responsible for off‐flavors? (2) What are the mechanisms by which these flavor compounds are generated? (3) What is the influence of thermal extrusion cooking (the primary structuring technique to transform plant proteins into fibrous products that resemble meat in texture) on the flavor characteristics of plant proteins? (4) What techniques are used in measuring the flavor properties of plant‐based proteins and products? (5) What strategies can be used to reduce off‐flavors and improve the sensory appeal of plant‐based meat alternatives? This article comprehensively discusses, for the first time, the flavor issues of plant‐based meat alternatives and the technologies available to improve flavor and, ultimately, acceptability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Balasundram, N., Sundram, K., & Samman, S. (2006) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.042 · Cited by 3,108
Dehydrated Foods, Chemistry of Browning Reactions in Model Systems
Hodge, J. E. (1953) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf60015a004 · Cited by 1,940
Phenolics in cereals, fruits and vegetables: Occurrence, extraction and analysis
Naczk, M., & Shahidi, F. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,398
Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review
Drewnowski, A., & Gomez-Carneros, C. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1424 · Cited by 1,353
Legumes and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects
Messina, M. J. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/70.3.439s · Cited by 1,223
Biosynthesis of plant‐derived flavor compounds
Schwab, W., Davidovich‐Rikanati, R., & Lewinsohn, E. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03446.x · Cited by 1,201
Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 · Cited by 1,048
Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment
Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660s · Cited by 1,021
Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods
Liener, I. E. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408399409527649 · Cited by 947
Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges
Sha, L., & Xiong, Y. L. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.022 · Cited by 856
Cited by
AI for food: Accelerating and democratizing discovery and innovation
Kuhl, E. (2025) · npj Science of Food · doi:10.1038/s41538-025-00441-8 · Cited by 76
Montemurro, M., Verni, M., Rizzello, C. G., & Pontonio, E. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12030485 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Tuccillo, F., Lampi, A., Knaapila, A., Pulkkinen, M., Kariluoto, S., Coda, R., Edelmann, M., Jouppila, K., Sandell, M., Piironen, V., & Katina, K.
- Venue
- Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2898-2929
- ISSN
- 1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224944552
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 189
- FWCI
- 29.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flavor challenges in extruded plant‐based meat alternatives: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1541-4337.12964
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Tuccillo, F., Lampi, A., Knaapila, A., Pulkkinen, M., Kariluoto, S., Coda, R., Edelmann, M., Jouppila, K., Sandell, M., Piironen, V., & Katina, K. (2022). Flavor challenges in extruded plant‐based meat alternatives: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.