The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The taphonomic impact of scavenger guilds in southern Quebec during summer and fall in two distinct habitats
Abstract
Decomposition of human remains is a complex process impacted by many intrinsic and extrinsic factors. A less‐studied extrinsic factor in forensic taphonomy are the scavengers that consume soft and hard tissue. Scavengers physically degrade and remove soft tissue, disperse, and destroy skeletal elements, which can make locating remains challenging. While invertebrate activity has been largely investigated, there is limited quantitative data available on vertebrate activity, particularly in Canada. This study aimed to determine which species (vertebrate and invertebrate) belong to the scavenger guilds in southern Quebec, and their potential taphonomic impact on the decomposition process. Two independent trials were conducted in 2020 using pig carcasses: one during summer in a forest habitat and one during fall in a grassland habitat. Each carcass was placed a minimum 100 m apart in semi‐rural land. Vertebrate scavenger activity was recorded by continuous surveillance using trail cameras. Carcasses were also regularly visited to monitor the decomposition process and the activity of invertebrate scavengers. Overall, the vertebrate scavenger guilds included a narrow range of corvids, turkey vultures, coyotes, and skunks. The intensity of vertebrate scavengers was greater in the grassland habitat (fall), while the intensity of invertebrate scavengers was greater in the forest habitat (summer). With the exception of invertebrate scavengers, very few species visited during the fresh stage of decomposition, and the probability of body displacement increased as decomposition progressed. These results identify which scavengers have the greatest taphonomic impact and highlight the importance of incorporating scavenger impact when searching for human remains.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain vegetation impairs visibility of remains, decreasing activity of visually-oriented scavengers.
“certain vegetation impairs visibility of the remains, decreasing activity of visually-oriented scavengers [53,88,124].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Seasons can greatly affect decomposition and vertebrate scavenging, e.g. due to differences in precipitation, temperature, or invertebrate colonisation rate.
“Seasons can greatly affect decomposition and vertebrate scavenging, e.g. due to differences in precipitation, temperature, or invertebrate colonisation rate [40,53,56,72,84,88].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1201/9781439821923.sec1 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
- 10.1080/00085030.1998.10757107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110392 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01020.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00085030.2014.929850 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.02017.x · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/9781439821923.ch12 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS11524J · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS11017J · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS13964J · DOI
- 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00411-X · DOI
- Goff ML, 1993, Estimation of postmortem interval using arthropod development and successional patterns, Forensic Sci Rev, 5, 81
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12750 · DOI
- 10.1080/00085030.2020.1820799 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12962 · DOI
- BrightLN.Taphonomic signatures of animal scavenging in northern California: a forensic anthropological analysis[Master thesis].Chico CA:California State University Chico;2011.
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00467.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/9781439821923.ch8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00134.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.14430/arctic2325 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/b18819-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/1934999 · DOI
- 10.4039/N04-086 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.05.019 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12032 · DOI
- 10.1201/9781439821923.sec3 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS12718J · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1520/JFS45305J · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12992 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1556-4029.14238 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1556-4029.13514 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.13694 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1556-4029.12597 · DOI
- 10.1111/1556-4029.13786 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-017-17794-0 · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS14474J · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS15375J · DOI
- 10.1080/00379271.2009.10697622 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Séguin, K., Durand‐Guévin, A., Lavallée, C., Ouimet, F., Maisonhaute, J., Watson, C. J., & Forbes, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Forbes, Shari L.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-11-02
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 460-470
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4029
- OpenAlex
- W3208334468
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/6098/2019)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- forensic taphonomy, scavenger guilds, human remains decomposition, vertebrate scavengers, Corvidae, turkey vulture, coyote, skunks, body displacement, seasonal variation, southern Quebec
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Birds, Feeding Behavior, Postmortem Changes, Quebec, Seasons, Swine, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review