Cited by 0Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies

Interpreting perimortem blast trauma from skeletal remains: Complications and considerations

McCormick, Kyle, Palmiotto, Andrea, Freas, Laurel E.·2023·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Blast trauma results from highly variable events that can lead to similar effects in the skeleton. Clinical literature, which largely focuses on soft tissue, provides limited efficacy for interpreting fully skeletonized cases. Interpretation of skeletal blast trauma is hampered by the low number of fully skeletonized case studies and experimental replication studies, which mainly use nonhuman proxies. The purpose of this study is to discuss fracture patterns on two individuals from WWII as a means to better understand and identify fracture patterns associated with blast trauma. Existing clinical and anthropological criteria are reviewed and applied to two World War II cases, both presumed to exhibit blast trauma based on historical contexts. These case studies exhibit combinations of complicated and extensive signs of blunt‐force and projectile trauma, reflecting the diversity of skeletal trauma resulting from blast‐related events. This analysis emphasizes the arguably impossible task of establishing a diagnosis based on the available literature and lack of prior knowledge about specific losses. Ultimately, analysts must consider the totality of skeletal trauma, combining biomechanical theory and relevant clinical and anthropological literature to arrive at useful yet defensible assessments of trauma. However, refined criteria and additional studies are needed to assess complicated trauma from blast‐related events in anthropological contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1556-4029.15270

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Metheny H, 2018, Historical report: ground incident 45, Betio Island, Tarawa atoll, Republic of Kiribati
  2. 10.1111/j.1556‐4029.2011.01938 · DOI
  3. Chipley M, 2003, Reference manual to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings: providing protection to people and building, 4‐1
  4. Seneviratne AB, 2008, Skeletal trauma identification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict, 117
  5. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.09.005 · DOI
  6. Bunker RJ, 2001, Grenades and land mines, Japanese. World war II in the Pacific: an encyclopedia, 210
  7. United States Navy Bomb Disposal School, 1944, Introduction to Japanese land mines beach mines and igniters, 169

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
McCormick, K., Palmiotto, A., & Freas, L. E.
Affiliations
  • Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency Laboratory Joint Base Pearl Harbor‐Hickam Hawaii USA
  • Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
McCormick, Kyle
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-09
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
1359-1371
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W4376105700
Cited by
0
References
30
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Keywords
skeletal trauma, fracture patterns, World War II casualties, blunt trauma, trauma diagnosis, forensic osteology
MeSH terms
Body Remains, Blast Injuries, Humans, Skeleton, Forensic Anthropology, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review