Cited by 861Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Not your ordinary yeast: non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered

Jolly, Neil P., Varela, Cristian, Pretorius, Isak S.·2014·FEMS Yeast Research

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and grape juice are 'natural companions' and make a happy wine marriage. However, this relationship can be enriched by allowing 'wild' non-Saccharomyces yeast to participate in a sequential manner in the early phases of grape must fermentation. However, such a triangular relationship is complex and can only be taken to 'the next level' if there are no spoilage yeast present and if the 'wine yeast' - S. cerevisiae - is able to exert its dominance in time to successfully complete the alcoholic fermentation. Winemakers apply various 'matchmaking' strategies (e.g. cellar hygiene, pH, SO2 , temperature and nutrient management) to keep 'spoilers' (e.g. Dekkera bruxellensis) at bay, and allow 'compatible' wild yeast (e.g. Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans and Candida/Metschnikowia pulcherrima) to harmonize with potent S. cerevisiae wine yeast and bring the best out in wine. Mismatching can lead to a 'two is company, three is a crowd' scenario. More than 40 of the 1500 known yeast species have been isolated from grape must. In this article, we review the specific flavour-active characteristics of those non-Saccharomyces species that might play a positive role in both spontaneous and inoculated wine ferments. We seek to present 'single-species' and 'multi-species' ferments in a new light and a new context, and we raise important questions about the direction of mixed-fermentation research to address market trends regarding so-called 'natural' wines. This review also highlights that, despite the fact that most frontier research and technological developments are often focussed primarily on S. cerevisiae, non-Saccharomyces research can benefit from the techniques and knowledge developed by research on the former.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1567-1364.12111

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jolly, N. P., Varela, C., & Pretorius, I. S.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Deciduous Fruit, Vines and Wine (ZA)
  • The Australian Wine Research Institute; Adelaide SA Australia
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
FEMS Yeast Research
Published
2013-11-11
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
215-237
ISSN
1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134106285
Cited by
861
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 13
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Macquarie University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
non-Saccharomyces yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, wine fermentation, mixed culture fermentation, wild yeast, spoilage yeasts, Dekkera bruxellensis, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans, grape must, wine flavor, spontaneous fermentation, inoculated fermentation, natural wine, SO2
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Fermentation, Research, Saccharomyces, Wine, Yeasts, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review