Not your ordinary yeast: non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and grape juice are 'natural companions' and make a happy wine marriage. However, this relationship can be enriched by allowing 'wild' non-Saccharomyces yeast to participate in a sequential manner in the early phases of grape must fermentation. However, such a triangular relationship is complex and can only be taken to 'the next level' if there are no spoilage yeast present and if the 'wine yeast' - S. cerevisiae - is able to exert its dominance in time to successfully complete the alcoholic fermentation. Winemakers apply various 'matchmaking' strategies (e.g. cellar hygiene, pH, SO2 , temperature and nutrient management) to keep 'spoilers' (e.g. Dekkera bruxellensis) at bay, and allow 'compatible' wild yeast (e.g. Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans and Candida/Metschnikowia pulcherrima) to harmonize with potent S. cerevisiae wine yeast and bring the best out in wine. Mismatching can lead to a 'two is company, three is a crowd' scenario. More than 40 of the 1500 known yeast species have been isolated from grape must. In this article, we review the specific flavour-active characteristics of those non-Saccharomyces species that might play a positive role in both spontaneous and inoculated wine ferments. We seek to present 'single-species' and 'multi-species' ferments in a new light and a new context, and we raise important questions about the direction of mixed-fermentation research to address market trends regarding so-called 'natural' wines. This review also highlights that, despite the fact that most frontier research and technological developments are often focussed primarily on S. cerevisiae, non-Saccharomyces research can benefit from the techniques and knowledge developed by research on the former.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits.
“Pichia kluyveri and related species (e.g., Wickerhamomyces anomalus, P. fermentans, etc.) are widely studied with respect to wine fermentation as well as biological control, mostly of fungal postharvest diseases of fruits [30, 96–101].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [100]
Cites
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216 · cited 23× · see citing works
“However, cellar surfaces play a smaller role than grapes as a source of non-Saccharomyces yeasts, as S. cerevisiae is the predominant yeast inhabiting such surfaces (Peynaud & Domercq, 1959; Rosini, 1984; LonvaudFunel, 1996; Pretorius, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationYeast interactions and wine flavour
Fleet, G. (2003) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00245-9 · Cited by 1,020 · see citing works
Influence of sequential yeast mixtures on wine fermentation
Clemente-Jimenez, J. M., Mingorance-Cazorla, L., Martínez-Rodríguez, S., Las Heras-Vázquez, F. J., & Rodríguez-Vico, F. (2005) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.06.007 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Sherman, D. J., Martin, T., Nikolski, M., Cayla, C., Souciet, J.-L., & Durrens, P. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn859 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Secondary Aroma: Influence of Wine Microorganisms in Their Aroma Profile
Carpena, M., Fraga-Corral, M., Otero, P., Nogueira, R. A., Garcia-Oliveira, P., Prieto, M. A., & Simal-Gandara, J. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10010051 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
“pulcherrima (telemorphic form of Metschnikowia pulcherrima), among others [21,51].”
BackgroundInfluentialHilber-Bodmer, M., Schmid, M., Ahrens, C. H., & Freimoser, F. M. (2017) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0908-z · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jolly, N. P., Varela, C., & Pretorius, I. S.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Deciduous Fruit, Vines and Wine (ZA)
- The Australian Wine Research Institute; Adelaide SA Australia
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Venue
- FEMS Yeast Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-237
- ISSN
- 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134106285
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Macquarie University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- non-Saccharomyces yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, wine fermentation, mixed culture fermentation, wild yeast, spoilage yeasts, Dekkera bruxellensis, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans, grape must, wine flavor, spontaneous fermentation, inoculated fermentation, natural wine, SO2
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Fermentation, Research, Saccharomyces, Wine, Yeasts, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review