The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gram-positive anaerobic cocci – commensals and opportunistic pathogens
Open accessAbstract
Among the Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria associated with clinical infections, the Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) are the most prominent and account for approximately 25-30% of all isolated anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Still, routine culture and identification of these slowly growing anaerobes to the species level has been limited in the diagnostic laboratory, mainly due to the requirement of prolonged incubation times and time-consuming phenotypic identification. In addition, GPAC are mostly isolated from polymicrobial infections with known pathogens and therefore their relevance has often been overlooked. However, through improvements in diagnostic and in particular molecular techniques, the isolation and identification of individual genera and species of GPAC associated with specific infections have been enhanced. Furthermore, the taxonomy of GPAC has undergone considerable changes over the years, mainly due to the development of molecular identification methods. Existing species have been renamed and novel species have been added, resulting in changes of the nomenclature. As the abundance and significance of GPAC in clinical infections grow, knowledge of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance patterns of different species becomes more important. The present review describes recent advances of GPAC and what is known of the biology and pathogenic effects of Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Parvimonas, Peptoniphilus and Peptostreptococcus, the most important GPAC genera isolated from human infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subtilases: the superfamily of subtilisin-like serine proteases.
Siezen, R. J., & Leunissen, J. A. M. (1997) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560060301 · Cited by 896
Cathelicidins - a family of multifunctional antimicrobial peptides
Bals, R., & Wilson, J. M. (2003) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s00018-003-2186-9 · Cited by 427
Sortase‐catalysed anchoring of surface proteins to the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus
Mazmanian, S. K., Ton‐That, H., & Schneewind, O. (2001) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02411.x · Cited by 387
A Comparison of Bacterial Composition in Diabetic Ulcers and Contralateral Intact Skin
Gontcharova, V., Youn, E., Sun, Y., Wolcott, R. D., & Dowd, S. E. (2010) · The Open Microbiology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874285801004010008 · Cited by 156
Potential role of anaerobic cocci in impaired human wound healing
Wall, I. B., Davies, C. E., Hill, K. E., Wilson, M. J., Stephens, P., Harding, K. G., & Thomas, D. W. (2002) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.t01-1-10602.x · Cited by 62
Bacterial Surface Protein L Binds and Inactivates Neutrophil Proteins S100A8/A9
Åkerström, B., & Björck, L. (2009) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901487 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius promotes colorectal carcinogenesis and modulates tumour immunity
Long, X., Wong, C. C., Tong, L., Chu, E. S. H., Ho Szeto, C., Go, M. Y. Y., Coker, O. O., Chan, A. W. H., Chan, F. K. L., Sung, J. J. Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-019-0541-3 · Cited by 557
Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Petrov, V. A., Saltykova, I. V., Zhukova, I. A., Alifirova, V. M., Zhukova, N. G., Dorofeeva, Y. B., Tyakht, A. V., Kovarsky, B. A., Alekseev, D. G., Kostryukova, E. S., et al. (2017) · Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10517-017-3700-7 · Cited by 487
McHardy, I. H., Li, X., Tong, M., Ruegger, P., Jacobs, J., Borneman, J., Anton, P., & Braun, J. (2013) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-26 · Cited by 234
Interactive relationships between intestinal flora and bile acids
Guo, X., Okpara, E. S., Hu, W., Yan, C., Wang, Y., Liang, Q., Chiang, J. Y. L., & Han, S. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23158343 · Cited by 206
Weis, S., Schwiertz, A., Unger, M. M., Becker, A., Faßbender, K., Ratering, S., Kohl, M., Schnell, S., Schäfer, K.-H., & Egert, M. (2019) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-019-0100-x · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, E. C., & Frick, I.-M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 520-553
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W1973473578
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gram-positive anaerobic cocci – commensals and opportunistic pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1574-6976.12005
- The paper
- Murphy, E. C., & Frick, I.-M. (2013). Gram-positive anaerobic cocci – commensals and opportunistic pathogens. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.