The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes
Abstract
Microbial source tracking (MST) describes a suite of methods and an investigative strategy for determination of fecal pollution sources in environmental waters that rely on the association of certain fecal microorganisms with a particular host. MST is used to assess recreational water quality and associated human health risk, and total maximum daily load allocations. Many methods rely on signature molecules (markers) such as DNA sequences of host-associated microorganisms. Human sewage pollution is among the greatest concerns for human health due to (1) the known risk of exposure to human waste and (2) the public and regulatory will to reduce sewage pollution; however, methods to identify animal sources are receiving increasing attention as our understanding of zoonotic disease potential improves. Here, we review the performance of MST methods in initial reports and field studies, with particular emphasis on quantitative PCR (qPCR). Relationships among human-associated MST markers, fecal indicator bacteria, pathogens, and human health outcomes are presented along with recommendations for future research. An integrated understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of the many MST methods targeting human sources advanced over the past several decades will benefit managers, regulators, researchers, and other users of this rapidly growing area of environmental microbiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance
Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E., & Larsson, D. G. J. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux053 · Cited by 1,167
Role of the Environment in the Transmission of Antimicrobial Resistance to Humans: A Review
Huijbers, P. M. C., Blaak, H., de Jong, M. C. M., Graat, E. A. M., Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C. M. J. E., & de Roda Husman, A. M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02566 · Cited by 425
Water and sanitation: an essential battlefront in the war on antimicrobial resistance
Bürgmann, H., Frigon, D., H Gaze, W., M Manaia, C., Pruden, A., Singer, A. C., F Smets, B., & Zhang, T. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiy101 · Cited by 182
Archaea: Essential Inhabitants of the Human Digestive Microbiota
Nkamga, V. D., Henrissat, B., & Drancourt, M. (2017) · Human Microbiome Journal · doi:10.1016/j.humic.2016.11.005 · Cited by 141
Bichai, F., & Ashbolt, N. (2017) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.003 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Harwood, V. J., Staley, C., Badgley, B. D., Borges, K., & Korajkic, A.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2090592781
- Cited by
- 730
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1574-6976.12031
- The paper
- Harwood, V. J., Staley, C., Badgley, B. D., Borges, K., & Korajkic, A. (2014). Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.