The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asia, Australia and New Zealand Dyspnoea in Emergency Departments (AANZDEM) study: Rationale, design and analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Shortness of breath is a common reason for ED attendance. This international study aims to describe the epidemiology of dyspnoea presenting to EDs in the S outh E ast A sia‐P acific region, to compare disease patterns across regions, to understand how conditions are investigated and treated, and to assess quality of care. Methods/Design: This is a prospective, interrupted time series cohort study conducted in EDs in A ustralia, N ew Z ealand, S ingapore, H ong K ong and M alaysia of consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED with dyspnoea as a main symptom. Data were collected over three 72 h periods in M ay, A ugust and O ctober 2014 (autumn, winter and spring), and included demographics, comorbidities, mode of arrival, usual medications, pre‐hospital treatment, initial assessment, ED investigations, treatment in the ED, ED diagnosis, disposition from ED, in‐hospital outcome and final hospital diagnosis. The primary outcomes of interest are the epidemiology and outcome of patients presenting to ED with dyspnoea. Secondary outcomes of interest are seasonal and geographic comparisons of diagnoses and outcomes, disease‐specific descriptions of epidemiology, investigation, treatment and disposition, and compliance with treatment guidelines. Discussion: This novel study will explore dyspnoea from the viewpoint of the patient's symptom (shortness of breath) rather than that of a single disease. The results will provide robust data about the epidemiology, investigation, treatment and disposition of this diverse patient group. The obtained data also have the potential to inform service planning and to quantify the proportion of patients with mixed cardiac and respiratory disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dyspnea has a wide range of possible etiologies, including cardiac, pulmonary, and infectious diseases.
“Patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea were chosen as the focus area for testing as dyspnea has a wide range of possible etiologies, including cardiac, pulmonary, and infectious diseases [13].”
From A Novel Diagnostic Decision Support System for Medical Professionals: Prospective Feasibility Study (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Parshall, M. B., Schwartzstein, R. M., Adams, L., Banzett, R. B., Manning, H. L., Bourbeau, J., Calverley, P. M., Gift, A. G., Harver, A., Lareau, S. C., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201111-2042st · Cited by 1,844
Does This Dyspneic Patient in the Emergency Department Have Congestive Heart Failure?
Wang, C. S. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.15.1944 · Cited by 589
Chen‐Tournoux, A., Wood, M. J., Krauser, D. G., Baggish, A. L., Tung, R. H., Anwaruddin, S., Picard, M. H., & Januzzi, J. L. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi811 · Cited by 144
Green, S. M. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.168.7.741 · Cited by 120
Therapeutic Conflicts in Emergency Department Patients with Multimorbidity: A Cross-Sectional Study
Markun, S., Holzer, B. M., Rodak, R., Kaplan, V., Wagner, C., Battegay, E., & Zimmerli, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110309 · Cited by 29
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Novel Diagnostic Decision Support System for Medical Professionals: Prospective Feasibility Study
Timiliotis, J., Blümke, B., Serfözö, P. D., Gilbert, S., Ondrésik, M., Türk, E., Hirsch, M. C., & Eckstein, J. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/29943 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, A., Keijzers, G., Klim, S., Graham, C. A., Craig, S., Kuan, W. S., Jones, P., Holdgate, A., Lawoko, C., Laribi, S., & AANZDEM Study Group
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Griffith University (AU)
- Western Health (AU)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Monash Medical Centre (AU)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
- Liverpool Hospital (AU)
- Victoria University (AU)
- Department of Emergency Medicine Saint Louis Lariboisiere Hospitals Paris France
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Anne‐Maree
- ORCID
- Venue
- Emergency Medicine Australasia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-191
- ISSN
- 1035-6851 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-6731
- 1742-6723
- OpenAlex
- W1911387107
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Emergency Medicine Australasia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation (na)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- dyspnea, emergency department presentation, seasonal variation, regional variation, quality of care, guideline adherence, diagnostic workup
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Australia, Dyspnea, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Malaysia, Male, New Zealand, Prospective Studies, Quality of Health Care, Singapore, Prevalence, Interrupted Time Series Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review