Cited by 4Insect behavior and control techniquesInsect Pheromone Research and ControlDiptera species taxonomy and behavior

Bi‐environmental cage for colony management in the mass rearing of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Open access
Meza, José S., Ibañez‐Palacios, Jorge, Cardenas‐Enriquez, Daisy P., Luis‐Alvares, Juan H., Liedo, Pablo·2025·Insect Science

Abstract

Anastrepha ludens (Loew) is controlled in Mexico using sterile insect technique (SIT). SIT relies primarily on mass-reared insects, which are subjected to the effects of selection during colonization and rearing, and that frequently result in modifications of their biology and behavior. Here, we propose and evaluate a novel "bi-environmental cage" for colony management which promotes more natural sexual selection. The cage allows each sex to reach sexual maturity in separate compartments acclimatized according to natural conditions. Females mature in areas where they can recognize oviposition sites, while males mature in areas populated with small trees to allow establishment of territories in leks and performance of courtship behaviors. To determine whether the bi-environmental cage can minimize the potential adverse effects on mating competitiveness, two strains of A. ludens were tested; wild flies strain and genetic sexing strain Tapachula 7 (mass-reared flies). We found that after 4 generations in the mass-reared flies in the bi-environmental cage showed a level of fecundity similar to that of flies from the conventional cage. A similar pattern was also seen in the case of wild flies in both types of cages. In addition, other biological attributes of the wild strain assessed over six generations showed adaptability to mass-rearing conditions. Wild males from the bi-environmental cages were more sexually competitive than those from the conventional cage. Our results show that it is possible to mitigate many of the detrimental effects of domestication on the sexual performance of mass-reared males by using close-to-natural conditions for colony management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1744-7917.70105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meza, J. S., Ibañez‐Palacios, J., Cardenas‐Enriquez, D. P., Luis‐Alvares, J. H., & Liedo, P.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (GT)
  • Programa Operativo de Moscas, SADER/SENASICA‐IICA, Metapa de Domínguez Chiapas México
  • El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (MX)
Corresponding author
Meza, José S.
Venue
Insect Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-06-27
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
1787-1798
ISSN
  • 1005-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1672-9609
  • 1744-7917
OpenAlex
W4411740429
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Insect Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Atomic Energy Agency (CRP code D42017 under the Contract Number 22676)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
Keywords
Anastrepha ludens, mass rearing, sterile insect technique, colony management, sexual selection, domestication effects, mating competitiveness, courtship behavior, Lek, fecundity, fruit flies
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Fertility, Housing, Animal, Male, Mexico, Pest Control, Biological, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Tephritidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review