Cited by 138Policing Practices and PerceptionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The Reverse Racism Effect: Are Cops More Hesitant to Shoot Black Than White Suspects?

James, Lois, James, Stephen M., Vila, Bryan J.·2016·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary: Race‐related debates often assume that implicit racial bias will result in racially biased decisions to shoot. Previous research has examined racial bias in police decisions by pressing “shoot” or “don't‐shoot” buttons in response to pictures of armed and unarmed suspects. As a result of its lack of external validity, however, this methodology provides limited insight into officer behavior in the field. In response, we conducted the first series of experimental research studies that tested police officers and civilians in strikingly realistic deadly force simulators. Policy Implications: This article reports the results of our most recent experiment, which tested 80 police patrol officers by applying this leading edge method. We found that, despite clear evidence of implicit bias against Black suspects, officers were slower to shoot armed Black suspects than armed White suspects, and they were less likely to shoot unarmed Black suspects than unarmed White suspects. These findings challenge the assumption that implicit racial bias affects police behavior in deadly encounters with Black suspects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12187

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • James et al. found that 78% of patrol officers exhibited a moderate or strong anti-Black unconscious bias on an implicit association test by more quickly associating weapons with Black people than with White people.

    “James et al. (2016) found that 78% of patrol of fi cers exhibited a moderate or strong anti-Black unconscious bias on an implicit association test by more quickly associating weapons with Black people than with White people.”

    From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as James et al., 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
James, Lois
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2016-01-14
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
457-479
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2234997330
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
87.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit racial bias, lethal force, police use of force, police decision-making, race and policing, patrol officers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review