Cited by 106Policing Practices and PerceptionsDeception detection and forensic psychologyCriminal Law and Evidence

Examining Body‐Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders

White, Michael D., Todak, Natalie, Gaub, Janne E.·2018·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary We explore integration and acceptance of body‐worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre‐ and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self‐initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time‐to‐case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12376

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, M. D., Todak, N., & Gaub, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
White, Michael D.
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2018-08
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
649-677
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W2886971603
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4
FWCI
60.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Laura and John Arnold Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police technology adoption, police-community relations, public perception of police, police accountability, stakeholder acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review