Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Threat assessment as a school violence prevention strategy

Cornell, Dewey G.·2020·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary: This paper describes the immense difficulty of predicting that someone is going to carry out a school shooting and then turns to threat assessment as a more promising violence prevention strategy. In schools, a multidisciplinary threat assessment team investigates reported threats and develops responses that are calibrated to the seriousness of the threat and the student's educational needs. Researchers have found that school teams have been able to resolve thousands of student threats with no serious acts of violence, yet permitting the majority of students to return to school. Controlled studies have found that schools using this approach can have reductions in the use of school suspension and improvements in student and teacher perceptions of school climate. Policy Implications: Threat assessment represents a fundamental shift in the risk assessment field away from the pursuit of predictive accuracy toward a broader approach to the prevention of violence by helping troubled individuals. Threat assessment offers schools a proactive alternative to reactive practices such as zero tolerance discipline and costly investment in building security measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1745-9133.12471

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1080/09243450802332184 · DOI
  2. American Psychological Association, 1999, Warning signs
  3. Borum R., 2003, Structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY)
  4. 10.3102/0013189X09357620 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/tam0000092 · DOI
  6. Canady M., 2012, To protect & educate: The school resource officer and the prevention of violence in schools
  7. 10.1007/BF01044882 · DOI
  8. Cornell D., 2018, Comprehensive School Threat Assessment Guidelines
  9. 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03547.x · DOI
  10. Cornell D., 2011, Reductions in long‐term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines, Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 95, 175
  11. 10.1007/s40688-017-0146-x · DOI
  12. 10.1037/spq0000220 · DOI
  13. 10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2 · DOI
  14. Cornell D., 2006, Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence
  15. 10.1037/a0016182 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086266 · DOI
  17. Daniels J. A., 2019, A preliminary report on the Police Foundation's Averted School Violence Database
  18. 10.1300/J202v06n01_06 · DOI
  19. Dwyer K., 1998, Early warning, timely response: A guide to safe schools
  20. 10.1136/bmj.e4692 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10474412.2014.929950 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hoffman J., 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment, 160
  23. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6803a1 · DOI
  24. Jamieson C., 2013, Psychological Science Agenda
  25. JustChildren, 2013, Prevention v. punishment: Threat assessment, school suspensions, and racial disparities
  26. Kann L., 2018, Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2017, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67, 1
  27. 10.1056/NEJM199310073291506 · DOI
  28. King S., 2019, School security in the post‐Columbine era: Trends, consequences, and future directions, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 1
  29. Kropp P. R., 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment, 178
  30. 10.1111/1745-9133.12468 · DOI
  31. Langman P., 2019, A comparison of averted and completed school attacks from the Police Foundation Averted School Violence Database
  32. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.006 · DOI
  33. McGee J. P., 1999, The classroom avenger, The Forensic Examiner, 8, 1
  34. 10.1111/1556-4029.12196 · DOI
  35. 10.1377/hlthaff.12.4.7 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/1045988X.2011.654366 · DOI
  37. Morgan E., 2014, The School Discipline Consensus Report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system
  38. 10.1001/jama.2013.38 · DOI
  39. National School Safety Center, 1998, Checklist of characteristics of youth who have caused school‐associated violent deaths
  40. 10.1080/15388220.2012.706764 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/tam0000038 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/a0038967 · DOI
  43. O'Toole M. E., 2000, The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective
  44. Otto R., 2010, Handbook of violence risk assessment
  45. Pollack W. S., 2008, Prior knowledge of potential school‐based violence: Information students learn may prevent a targeted attack
  46. Riedman D., 2018, K‐12 school shooting database: Research methodology
  47. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2565 · DOI
  48. 10.1207/S15326918CS0303_2 · DOI
  49. Straub F., 2018, How students can help SROs and others avert school violence, The Journal of School Safety, 32
  50. 10.1177/019874290803400104 · DOI
  51. Toupin J., 1993, Homicide: The victim/offender connection, 135
  52. Vossekuil B., 2002, The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative
  53. Whitaker A., 2019, Cops and no counselors how the lack of school mental health staff is harming students
  54. 10.1037/a0020473 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Cornell, D. G.
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2020-01-10
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
235-252
ISSN
  • 1538-6473
  • 1745-9133
Cited by
63
References
2
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.