The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of sentencing reform on racial and ethnic disparities in involvement with the criminal justice system: The case of California's proposition 47
Abstract
We analyze the disparate effects of a recent California sentencing reform on the arrest, booking, and incarceration rates experienced by California residents from different racial and ethnic groups. In November 2014, California voters passed state Proposition 47 that redefined a series of felony and “wobbler” offenses (offenses that can be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor) as straight misdemeanors, causing an immediate 15% decline in total drug arrests, an approximate 20% decline in total property crime arrests, and shifts in the composition of arrests away from felonies towards misdemeanors. Using microdata on the universe of arrests in the state in conjunction with demographic data from the American Community Survey, we document a substantial narrowing in interracial differences in overall arrest rates and arrest rates by offense type, with very large declines in the interracial arrest rate gaps for felony drug offenses. We see declines in bookings rates for all groups (conditional on being arrested), though we find a larger decrease for white arrestees. This relatively greater decline for white arrests is largely explained by differences in the distribution of arrests across recorded offenses. Despite the widening of racial gaps in the conditional booking rate, we observe substantial declines in overall booked arrests that are larger for African Americans and Hispanics relative to Whites and Asians. For some offenses (felony drug offenses), interracial disparities in jail booking rates narrow by nearly half. Finally, we use data from the American Community Survey to analyze changes in the proportion incarcerated on any given day and how these changes vary by race and ethnicity. For these results, we present trends for the time period spanning the larger set of policy reforms that have been implemented in the state since 2011. We observe sizable declines in the overall incarceration rate for African Americans, with the largest declines observed for African American males. The one quarter decline in total correctional populations in the state coincided with sizable narrowing in interracial differences in incarceration rates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research is already showing reductions in disproportionality associated with one California policy that recategorized some drug and property offenses as less serious misdemeanors.
“Research is already showing reductions in disproportionality associated with one California policy that recategorized some drug and property offenses as less serious misdemeanors (Lofstrom et al., 2020; MacDonald & Raphael, 2020).”
From A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems. (2022) · cites this paper as Lofstrom et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., & Yang, C. S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20161503 · Cited by 564
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1111/1745-9133.12378 · DOI
- Bird M., 2016, Realignment and recidivism, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1, 176, 10.1177/0002716215603319 · DOI
- California Judicial Council, 2016, Prop 47 frequently asked questions: Updated November 2016
- Carson A. E. &Anderson E.(2016).Prisoners in 2015(Bulletin NCJ 250229).Washington DC:U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Dominguez Rivera P. Lofstrom M. &Raphael S.(2019).The effect of sentencing reform on crime rates: Evidence from California's Proposition 47. University of California Berkeley Working Paper. · DOI
- Donnelly E. A., 2018, The downstream effects of bail and pretrial detention on racial disparities in incarceration, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 108, 775
- Feigenberg B. &Miller C.(2018).Racial divisions and criminal jusice: Evidence from southern state courts. University of California Berkeley Working Paper. · DOI
- Heaton P., 2017, The downstream consequences of misdemeanor pretrial detention, Stanford Law Review, 69, 711
- 10.2307/2094764 · DOI
- Kaeble D. Maruschak L. &Bonczar T. P.(2015).Probation and parole in the United States 2014(Bulletin NCJ 249057).Washington DC:U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- 10.1111/1745-9133.12203 · DOI
- 10.1177/0002716215599732 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304445 · DOI
- Minton T. D. &Zeng Z.(2015)Jail inmates at midyear 2014(Bulletin NCJ 248629). U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- 10.4159/9780674286658 · DOI
- Petersilia J., 2014, California prison downsizing and its impact on local criminal justice systems, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 8, 327
- 10.1086/701068 · DOI
- Raphael S., 2013, Why are so many Americans in prison?
- 10.1086/677255 · DOI
- 10.1086/449253 · DOI
- 10.1111/1745-9133.12199 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780195077209.001.0001 · DOI
- Truman J. L. &Morgan R. E.(2016).Criminal victimization 2015(Bulletin NCJ 250180).Washington DC:U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A call to dismantle systemic racism in criminal legal systems.
Najdowski, C. J., & Stevenson, M. C. (2022) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000510 · Cited by 21
“Research is already showing reductions in disproportionality associated with one California policy that recategorized some drug and property offenses so they are considered less serious misdemeanors (Lofstrom et al., 2020; MacDonald & Raphael, 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lofstrom, M., Martin, B., & Raphael, S.
- Affiliations
- Public Policy Institute of California (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lofstrom, Magnus
- ORCID
- Raphael, Steven
- Venue
- Criminology & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-10-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1165-1207
- ISSN
- 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9133
- OpenAlex
- W3020866687
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- sentencing reform, racial and ethnic disparities, arrest rates, incarceration rates, drug offenses, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, white arrestees, California
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review