Cited by 35Dietetics, Nutrition, and EducationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyNursing Roles and Practices

Referrals to dietitians/nutritionists: A cross-sectional analysis of Australian GP registrars’ clinical practice

Open access
Mulquiney, Katie J., Tapley, Amanda, van Driel, Mieke L., Morgan, Simon, Davey, Andrew R., Henderson, Kim M., Spike, Neil A., Kerr, Rohan H. +3 more·2018·Nutrition & Dietetics

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to describe referral patterns of general practitioner (GP) registrars to dietitians/nutritionists. There is a paucity of research regarding GP referral patterns to dietitians/nutritionists. Limited data show increasing referrals from established GPs to dietitians/nutritionists. There are no data on GP registrar (trainee) referrals. Methods: This was a cross‐sectional analysis of data from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. ReCEnT is an ongoing, multicentre, prospective cohort study of registrars, which documents 60 consecutive consultations of each registrar in each of the three six‐month GP training terms. The outcome factor in this analysis was a problem/diagnosis resulting in dietitian/nutritionist referral (2010–2015). Independent variables were related to registrar, patient, practice and consultation. Results: A total of 1124 registrars contributed data from 145 708 consultations. Of 227 190 problems/diagnoses, 587 (0.26% (confidence interval: 0.23–0.29)) resulted in dietitian/nutritionist referral. The most common problems/diagnoses referred related to overweight/obesity (27.1%) and type 2 diabetes (21.1%). Of referrals to a dietitian/nutritionist, 60.8% were for a chronic disease, and 38.8% were related to a Chronic Disease Management plan. Dietitian/nutritionist referral was significantly associated with a number of independent variables reflecting continuity of care, patient complexity, chronic disease, health equity and registrar engagement. Conclusions: Established patients with chronic disease and complex care needs are more likely than other patients to be referred by registrars to dietitians/nutritionists. Nutrition behaviours are a major risk factor in chronic disease, and we have found evidence for dietitian/nutritionist referrals representing one facet of engagement by registrars with patients’ complex care needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1747-0080.12377

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J et al. General practice activity in Australia 2015-16. General practice series no. 40. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2016.
  2. Valenti L. The management of overweight and obesity in adults attending general practice in Australia. Master of Medical Statistics thesis. University of Newcastle, 2008.
  3. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J et al. General practice activity in Australia 2014-15. General Practice series no. 38. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2015.
  4. Jacobson TA, Maki KC, Orringer CE et al. National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2. J Clin Lipidol 2015; 9: S1- 122.e1.
  5. Millen BE, Wolongevicz DM, Nonas CA, Lichtenstein AH. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: implications and new opportunities for registered dietitian nutritionists. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114: 1730-5.
  6. Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J et al. A decade of Australian general practice activity 2004-05 to 2013-14. General practice series no. 37. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2014.
  7. Ball L, Larsson R, Gerathy R, Hood P, Lowe C. Working profile of Australian private practice Accredited Practising Dietitians. Nutr Diet 2013; 70: 196-205.
  8. Morgan S, Magin PJ, Henderson KM et al. Study protocol: The registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 50.
  9. Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) Primary Curriculum -Third Edition. [http://www.acrrm.org.au/primary-curriculum] Accessed 20/11/2011.
  10. Eva K: What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2004, 39:98-106.
  11. Binns HJ, Lanier D, Pace WD, Galliher JM, Ganiats TG, Grey M, Ariza AJ, Willaims R: Describing primary care encounters: the Primary Care Network Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Ann Fam Med 2007, 5(1):39-47.
  12. Crampton P, Jatrana S, Lay-Yee R, Davis P: Exposure to primary medical care in New Zealand: number and duration of general practitioner visits. N Z Med J 2007, 120:U2582.
  13. Thomas D, Heller RF, Hunt JM: Clinical consultations in an aboriginal community-controlled health service: a comparison with general practice. Aust NZ J Public Health 1998, 22(1):86-91.
  14. Flegg KM M, Phillips CB B, Collins AL L, Sharp PG G, Kanagasundaram M, Lovett RW W, Kljakovic M: Health service attendance patterns in an urban Aboriginal health service. MJA 2010, 193:146-148.
  15. Britt H, Miles DA, Bridges-Webb C, Neary S, Charles J, Traynor V: A comparison of country and metropolitan general practice. Aust Fam Physician 1994, 23(6):1116-1121. 1124-1125.
  16. Tolhurst H, Baker L, Murray G, Bell P, Sutton A, Dean S: Rural general practitioner experience of work-related violence in Australia. Aust J Rural Health 2003, 11(5):231-236.
  17. Magin PJ, Adams J, Sibbritt DW, Joy E, Ireland MC: Experiences of occupational violence in Australian urban general practice: a cross- sectional study of GPs. MJA 2005, 183(7):352-356.
  18. Watters DA, Green AJ, Rij A: The surgical trainee log we need: minimum of work, maximum of output. ANZ J Surg 2006, 76(3):181-184.
  19. Fleming DM: A comparison of the practice activities of trainees and principals. J R Coll Gen Pract 1986, 36(286):212-216.
  20. Weeda G: The workload of trainees in general practice. Med Educ 1997, 31:138-143.
  21. Bridges-Webb C, Britt H, Miles DA, Neary S, Charles J, Traynor V: Morbidity and treatment in general practice in Australia 1990-1991. Med J Aust 1992, 157:S1-S56.
  22. Rattner SL, Louis DZ, Rabinowitz C, Gottlieb JE, Nasca TJ, Markham FW, Gottlieb RP, Caruso JW, Lane JL, Veloski J, Hojat M, Gonnella JS: Documenting and Comparing Medical Students' Clinical Experiences. JAMA 2001, 286:1035-1040.
  23. Kowlowitz V, Slatt LM, Kollisch DO, Strayhorn G: Monitoring students' clinical experiences during a third year family medicine clerkship. Academic Medicine 1996, 71:387-389.
  24. Kurth RJ, Silenzio V, Irigoyen MM: Use of personal digital assistants to enhance educational evaluation in a primary care clerkship. Med Teach 2002, 24(5):488-490.
  25. Nierenberg DW, Eliassen MS, McAllister SB, Reid BP, Pipas CF, Young WW, Ogrinc GS: A web-based system for students to document their experiences within six core competency domains during all clinical clerkships. Acad Med 2007, 82(1):51-73.
  26. Denton GD, DeMott C, Pangaro LN, Hemmer PA: Narrative Review: Use of Student-Generated Logbooks in Undergraduate Medical Education. Teach Learn Med 2006, 18(2):153-164.
  27. Menzl HB, Jordan KP, Roddy E, Croft P: Characteristics of primary care consultations for musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems in the UK. Rheumatology 2010, 49:1391-1398.
  28. van Dijk CE, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen PP, de Bakker DH: Minor surgery in general practice and effects on referrals to hospital care: Observational study. BMC Health Services Research 2011, 11:2. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/2] Accessed 21/11/11.
  29. Britt H, Meza RA, Del Mar C: Methodology of morbidity and treatment data collection in general practice in Australia: a comparison of two methods. Fam Pract 1996, 13(5):462-467.
  30. Britt H, Harris M, Driver B, Bridges-Webb C, O'Toole B, Neary S: Reasons for encounter and diagnosed health problems: convergence between doctors and patients. Fam Pract 1992, 9(2):191-194.
  31. Gruen RL, Knox S, Carson P, O'Rourke IC, Britt H, Bailie RS: The demand for surgery: an analysis of referrals from Australian general practitioners. ANZ J Surg 2004, 74(10):863-868.
  32. Charles J, Britt H, Valenti L: The evolution of the general practice workforce in Australia, 1991-2003. Med J Aust 2004, 181(2):85-90.
  33. Britt HC, Harrison CM, Miller GC, Knox SA: Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia. Med J Aust 2008, 189(2):72-77.
  34. Miller G, Britt H, Pan Y, Knox S: Relationship between general practitioner certification and characteristics of care. Med Care 2004, 42(8):770-778.
  35. Miller GC, Britt HC, Valenti L: Adverse drug events in general practice patients in Australia. Med J Aust 2006, 184(7):321-324.
  36. Doran CM, Valenti L, Robinson M, Britt H, Mattrick RP: Smoking status of Australian general practice patients and their attempts to quit. Addict Behav 2006, 31(5):758-766.
  37. Chen MY, Pan Y, Britt H, Donovan B: Trends in clinical encounters for pelvic inflammatory disease and epididymitis in a national sample of Australian general practices. Int J STD AIDS 2006, 17(6):384-386.
  38. Harris MF, Furler J, Valenti L, Harris E, Britt H: Matching care to need in general practice: A secondary analysis of Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) data. Aust J Prim Health 2004, 10(3):151-155.
  39. Patil NG, Lee P: Interactive logbooks for medical students: are they useful? Med Educ 2002, 36:672-677.
  40. Carney PA, Pipas CF, Eliassen MS, Donahue DA, Kollisch DO, Gephart D, Dietrich AJ: An encounter-based analysis of the nature of teaching and learning in a 3 rd-year medical school clerkship. Teach Learn Med 2000, 12(1):21-27.
  41. Thomas PA, Goldberg H: Tracking Reflective Practice-Based Learning by Medical Students during an Ambulatory Clerkship. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22(11):1583-1586.
  42. Snadden D, Thomas ML, Griffin EM, Hudson H: Portfolio-based learning and general practice vocational training. Med Educ 1996, 30:148-152.
  43. van Roosmalen MS, Braspenning JC, De Smet PA, Grol RP: Antibiotic prescribing in primary care: first choice and restrictive prescribing are two different traits. Qual Safe Health Care 2007, 16:105-109.
  44. Markham FW: Evaluations of medical students' clinical experiences in a family medicine clerkship: differences in patient encounters by disease severity in different clerkship sites. Fam Med 2002, 34(6):451-454.
  45. Magin P, Adams J, Sibbritt D, Joy E, Ireland M: Effects of occupational violence on Australian general practitioners' provision of home visits and after-hours care: a cross-sectional study. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, 14(2):336-342.
  46. Magin P, Adams J, Ireland M, Joy E, Heaney S, Darab S: The response of general practitioners to the threat of violence in their practices: results from a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2006, 23(3):273-278.
  47. Mulquiney, K. J., Tapley, A., van Driel, M. L., Morgan, S., Davey, A. R., Henderson, K. M., Spike, N. A., Kerr, R. H., Watson, J. F., Catzikiris, N. F. & Magin, P. J. (2018). Referrals to dietitians/nutritionists: A cross-sectional analysis of Australian GP registrars' clinical practice. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 75 (1), pp.98-105. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12377. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/293456

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulquiney, K. J., Tapley, A., van Driel, M. L., Morgan, S., Davey, A. R., Henderson, K. M., Spike, N. A., Kerr, R. H., Watson, J. F., Catzikiris, N. F., & Magin, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • General Practice and Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
  • Elermore Vale General Practice Newcastle New South Wales Australia
  • NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit GP Synergy Newcastle New South Wales Australia
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • General Practice Training Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia
  • Ethos Health Newcastle West New South Wales Australia
Corresponding author
Mulquiney, Katie J.
Venue
Nutrition & Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
98-105
ISSN
  • 1446-6368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0080
OpenAlex
W2756313449
Cited by
35
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition & Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Commonwealth Department of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
dietitian referral, general practitioner registrars, general practice training, referral patterns, continuity of care, chronic disease management, overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, patient complexity, health equity
MeSH terms
Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Referral and Consultation, General Practice, Nutritionists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review