The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Although several therapeutic approaches are available for wound and burn treatment and much progress has been made in this area, room for improvement still exists, driven by the urgent need of better strategies to accelerate wound healing and recovery, mostly for cases of severe burned patients. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a biopolymer produced by bacteria with several advantages over vegetal cellulose, such as purity, high porosity, permeability to liquid and gases, elevated water uptake capacity and mechanical robustness. Besides its biocompatibility, BC can be modified in order to acquire antibacterial response and possible local drug delivery features. Due to its intrinsic versatility, BC is the perfect example of a biotechnological response to a clinical problem. In this review, we assess the BC main features and emphasis is given to a specific biomedical application: wound dressings. The production process and the physical–chemical properties that entitle this material to be used as wound dressing namely for burn healing are highlighted. An overview of the most common BC composites and their enhanced properties, in particular physical and biological, is provided, including the different production processes. A particular focus is given to the biochemistry and genetic manipulation of BC. A summary of the current marketed BC‐based wound dressing products is presented, and finally, future perspectives for the usage of BC as wound dressing are foreseen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction
Berridge, M. V., Herst, P. M., & Tan, A. S. (2005) · Biotechnology Annual Review · doi:10.1016/s1387-2656(05)11004-7 · Cited by 2,222
Cited by
Chitosan and Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Wound Management
Alven, S., & Aderibigbe, B. A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21249656 · Cited by 382
Gupta, A., Briffa, S. M., Swingler, S., Gibson, H., Kannappan, V., Adamus, G., Kowalczuk, M., Martin, C., & Radecka, I. (2020) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01724 · Cited by 359
Recent trends on wound management: New therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers
Okur, M. E., Karantas, I. D., Şenyiğit, Z., Üstündağ Okur, N., & Siafaka, P. I. (2020) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.008 · Cited by 298
Recent Advances and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose in Biomedicine
Swingler, S., Gupta, A., Gibson, H., Kowalczuk, M., Heaselgrave, W., & Radecka, I. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13030412 · Cited by 266
Kadier, A., Ilyas, R. A., Huzaifah, M. R. M., Harihastuti, N., Sapuan, S. M., Harussani, M. M., Azlin, M. N. M., Yuliasni, R., Ibrahim, R., Atikah, M. S. N., et al. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13193365 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Portela, R., Leal, C. R., Almeida, P. L., & Sobral, R. G.
- Venue
- Microbial Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 586-610
- ISSN
- 1751-7915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2922525822
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1751-7915.13392
- The paper
- Portela, R., Leal, C. R., Almeida, P. L., & Sobral, R. G. (2019). Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microbial Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.