The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The use of microbial tools to sustainably increase agricultural production has received significant attention from researchers, industries and policymakers. Over the past decade, the market access and development of microbial products have been accelerated by (i) the recent advances in plant‐associated microbiome science, (ii) the pressure from consumers and policymakers for increasing crop productivity and reducing the use of agrochemicals, (iii) the rising threats of biotic and abiotic stresses, (iv) the loss of efficacy of some agrochemicals and plant breeding programs and (v) the calls for agriculture to contribute towards mitigating climate change. Although the sector is still in its infancy, the path towards effective microbial products is taking shape and the global market of these products has increased faster than that of agrochemicals. Promising results from using microbes either as biofertilizers or biopesticides have been continually reported, fuelling optimism and high expectations for the sector. However, some limitations, often related to low efficacy and inconsistent performance in field conditions, urgently need to be addressed to promote a wider use of microbial tools. We propose that advances in in situ microbiome manipulation approaches, such as the use of products containing synthetic microbial communities and novel prebiotics, have great potential to overcome some of these current constraints. Much more progress is expected in the development of microbial inoculants as areas such as synthetic biology and nano‐biotechnology advance. If key technical, translational and regulatory issues are addressed, microbial tools will not only play an important role in sustainably boosting agricultural production over the next few decades but also contribute towards other sustainable development goals, including job creation and mitigation of the impacts of climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability—A Review
Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S., & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21050573 · Cited by 1,426
Combining Biocontrol Agents with Chemical Fungicides for Integrated Plant Fungal Disease Control
Ons, L., Bylemans, D., Thevissen, K., & Cammue, B. P. A. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8121930 · Cited by 438
Everything you must know about Azospirillum and its impact on agriculture and beyond
Cassán, F., Coniglio, A., López, G., Molina, R., Nievas, S., de Carlan, C. L. N., Donadio, F., Torres, D., Rosas, S., Pedrosa, F. O., et al. (2020) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-020-01463-y · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Batista, B. D., & Singh, B. K.
- Venue
- Microbial Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-22
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1258-1268
- ISSN
- 1751-7915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3174475288
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1751-7915.13866
- The paper
- Batista, B. D., & Singh, B. K. (2021). Realities and hopes in the application of microbial tools in agriculture. Microbial Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.