Cited by 37Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Cancer risk of sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review: 2型糖尿病患者中发生癌症风险与磺脲类药物使用相关性的系统性评价

Chen, Yuehong, Du, Liang, Li, Ling, Ma, Jun, Geng, Xingyuan, Yao, Xun, Liu, Guanjian, Sun, Xin·2017·Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

Background Increasing evidence suggests that oral hypoglycemic agents used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may affect cancer risk. Sulfonylureas (SUs) are the most frequently used antidiabetic medications for T2DM. Whether using SUs has any effect on cancer has received considerable attention. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of SUs on cancer risk in T2DM patients. Methods Published studies were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, and ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for additional information to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies. The abstracts and full text were screened, data collected, and the risk of bias assessed for each individual study. Results Seventy-seven studies (33 RCTs, 27 cohort studies, and 17 case-control studies) were analyzed. The RCTs did not report a difference in the risk of malignant tumor between SU-treated T2DM patients and controls (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.18); cohort studies showed that cancer risk was higher in patients using SUs than metformin (relative risk 1.60 [95%CI 1.37-1.87]; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 [95%CI 1.06-1.19]), and case-control studies suggested a trend for increased cancer risk in those using SUs compared with non-SU users (adjusted OR 1.13; 95%CI 0.93-1.37). Conclusions The available evidence clearly shows that SUs can significantly increase the risk of cancer compared with metformin. A…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-0407.12435

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Du, L., Li, L., Ma, J., Geng, X., Yao, X., Liu, G., & Sun, X.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • The Second People's Hospital Mudanjiang China
  • Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Xin
Venue
Journal of Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
482-494
ISSN
  • 1753-0393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0407
OpenAlex
W2417046068
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sichuan University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
sulfonylureas, type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, oral antidiabetic drugs, metformin, drug safety, antidiabetic drugs
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review