Cited by 102Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Digital health technology and diabetes management: 数字化医疗技术与糖尿病管理

Cahn, Avivit, Akirov, Amit, Raz, Itamar·2018·Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

Diabetes care is largely dependent on patient self‐management and empowerment, given that patients with diabetes must make numerous daily decisions as to what to eat, when to exercise, and determine their insulin dose and timing if required. In addition, patients and providers are generating vast amounts of data from many sources, including electronic medical records, insulin pumps, sensors, glucometers, and other wearables, as well as evolving genomic, proteomic, metabolomics, and microbiomic data. Multiple digital tools and apps have been developed to assist patients to choose wisely, and to enhance their compliance by using motivational tools and incorporating incentives from social media and gaming techniques. Healthcare teams (HCTs) and health administrators benefit from digital developments that sift through the enormous amounts of patient‐generated data. Data are acquired, integrated, analyzed, and presented in a self‐explanatory manner, highlighting important trends and items that require attention. The use of decision support systems may propose data‐driven actions that, for the most, require final approval by the patient or physician before execution and, once implemented, may improve patient outcomes. The digital diabetes clinic aims to incorporate all digital patient data and provide individually tailored virtual or face‐to‐face visits to those persons who need them most. Digital diabetes care has demonstrated only modest HbA1c reduction in multiple studies and borderline cost‐effectiveness, although patient satisfaction appears to be increased. Better understanding of the barriers to digital diabetes care and identification of unmet needs may yield improved utilization of this evolving technology in a safe, effective, and cost‐saving manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1753-0407.12606

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahn, A., Akirov, A., & Raz, I.
Affiliations
  • Hadassah Medical Center (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Raz, Itamar
Venue
Journal of Diabetes
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
10-17
ISSN
  • 1753-0393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0407
OpenAlex
W2753063830
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
digital health technologies, diabetes management, patient self-management, patient empowerment, patient-generated health data, decision support system, HbA1c, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, mobile health apps, wearable sensors, insulin pump
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Disease Management, Internet, Biomedical Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review