Cited by 132Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsDiabetes Management and Research

Mobile and Wearable Technology for the Monitoring of Diabetes-Related Parameters: Systematic Review

Open access
Rodriguez-León, Ciro, Villalonga, Claudia, Munoz-Torres, Manuel, Ruiz, Jonatan R, Banos, Oresti·2021·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that affects hundreds of millions of people worldwide and causes several million deaths every year. Such a dramatic scenario puts some pressure on administrations, care services, and the scientific community to seek novel solutions that may help control and deal effectively with this condition and its consequences. Objective: This study aims to review the literature on the use of modern mobile and wearable technology for monitoring parameters that condition the development or evolution of diabetes mellitus. Methods: A systematic review of articles published between January 2010 and July 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Manuscripts were identified through searching the databases Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed as well as through hand searching. Manuscripts were included if they involved the measurement of diabetes-related parameters such as blood glucose level, performed physical activity, or feet condition via wearable or mobile devices. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: The search yielded 1981 articles. A total of 26 publications met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Studies predominantly used wearable devices to monitor diabetes-related parameters. The accelerometer was by far the most used sensor, followed by the glucose monitor and heart rate monitor. Most studies applied some type of processing to the collected data, mainly consisting of statistical analysis or machine learning for activity recognition, finding associations among health outcomes, and diagnosing conditions related to diabetes. Few studies have focused on type 2 diabetes, even when this is the most prevalent type and the only preventable one. None of the studies focused on common diabetes complications. Clinical trials were fairly limited or nonexistent in most of the studies, with a common lack of detail about cohorts and case selection, comparability, and outcomes. Explicit endorsement by ethics committees or review boards was missing in most studies. Privacy or security issues were seldom addressed, and even if they were addressed, they were addressed at a rather insufficient level. Conclusions: The use of mobile and wearable devices for the monitoring of diabetes-related parameters shows early promise. Its development can benefit patients with diabetes, health care professionals, and researchers. However, this field is still in its early stages. Future work must pay special attention to privacy and security issues, the use of new emerging sensor technologies, the combination of mobile and clinical data, and the development of validated clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/25138

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]IDF Diabetes Atlas: Ninth Edition 2019 2019 Belgium International Diabetes Federation 1 176
  2. [26]Yu K Beam AL Kohane IS Artificial intelligence in healthcare Nat Biomed Eng 2018 10 2 10 719 31 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 31015651 31015651 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez-León, C., Villalonga, C., Munoz-Torres, M., Ruiz, J. R., & Banos, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Cienfuegos (CU)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2021-06-03
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e25138
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138313270
Cited by
132
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, wearable devices, mobile health, diabetes monitoring, blood glucose monitoring, physical activity monitoring, accelerometer, type 2 diabetes, activity recognition, machine learning, data privacy and security, diabetes complications
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review