Understanding the effects of being separated from family on refugees in Australia: a qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact of family separation on refugees living in Australia. METHOD: Thirteen participants with a refugee background and experiencing separation from family participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview. Interviews were coded and a thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software. RESULTS: Identified themes were organised under four domains. Domain 1 focused on the personal impact of family separation. Themes were the effects on mental health and functioning, driven by incessant worrying about the safety of family and the absence of key attachment figures, the specific effects of having missing family, alterations to self-identity and family dynamics. Domain 2 focused on themes relating to actions taken to find missing family, connect or reunite with separated family. Domain 3 highlighted the coping strategies, support mechanisms and protective factors used by participants. Domain 4 identified core beliefs about the importance of family unity, focusing on security, settlement and a happy future. CONCLUSIONS: Family separation has an enduring effect on the wellbeing of refugees, with key pathways being ongoing fear and insecurity, disrupted social attachments and identity shifts in relation to the future self. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Refugees separated from or missing family struggle with ongoing stress and adjustment issues.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019) · Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 · Cited by 19,677 · see citing works
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019) · SAGE Open Medicine · doi:10.1177/2050312118822927 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
Li, S. S. Y., Liddell, B. J., & Nickerson, A. (2016) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-016-0723-0 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial baseline theory: the social regulation of risk and effort
Coan, J. A., & Sbarra, D. A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.021 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Chung, M. C., Shakra, M., AlQarni, N., AlMazrouei, M., Al Mazrouei, S., & Al Hashimi, S. (2018) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.2017.1354620 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nickerson, A., Hoffman, J., Keegan, D., Kashyap, S., Argadianti, R., Tricesaria, D., Pestalozzi, Z., Nandyatama, R., Khakbaz, M., Nilasari, N., et al. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102672 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationPop, V., Williamson, C., Khan, R., Leightley, D., Fear, N. T., & Dyball, D. (2025) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2500885 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Refugees often lose contact with friends and family due to migration (Liddell et al., 2022).”
- Authors
- Liddell, B. J., Batch, N., Hellyer, S., Bulnes‐Diez, M., Kamte, A., Klassen, C., Wong, J., Byrow, Y., & Nickerson, A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Liddell, Belinda J.
- Venue
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 647-653
- ISSN
- 1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220720577
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (LP160100670)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Keywords
- family separation, refugees, refugee mental health, attachment, self-identity, coping strategies, family reunification, family unity, well-being
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Australia, Humans, Mental Health, Refugees, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
