The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods
Abstract
The quantification of the biological diversity in environmental samples using high‐throughput DNA sequencing is hindered by the PCR bias caused by variable primer–template mismatches of the individual species. In some dietary studies, there is the added problem that samples are enriched with predator DNA, so often a predator‐specific blocking oligonucleotide is used to alleviate the problem. However, specific blocking oligonucleotides could coblock nontarget species to some degree. Here, we accurately estimate the extent of the PCR biases induced by universal and blocking primers on a mock community prepared with DNA of twelve species of terrestrial arthropods. We also compare universal and blocking primer biases with those induced by variable annealing temperature and number of PCR cycles. The results show that reads of all species were recovered after PCR enrichment at our control conditions (no blocking oligonucleotide, 45 °C annealing temperature and 40 cycles) and high‐throughput sequencing. They also show that the four factors considered biased the final proportions of the species to some degree. Among these factors, the number of primer–template mismatches of each species had a disproportionate effect (up to five orders of magnitude) on the amplification efficiency. In particular, the number of primer–template mismatches explained most of the variation (~3/4) in the amplification efficiency of the species. The effect of blocking oligonucleotide concentration on nontarget species relative abundance was also significant, but less important (below one order of magnitude). Considering the results reported here, the quantitative potential of the technique is limited, and only qualitative results (the species list) are reliable, at least when targeting the barcoding COI region.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the amplification efficiency of the COI gene varies among species, and this might severely bias results [34,39] particularly in view of the variation in biomass.”
In the citing paper
“the amplification efficiency of the COI gene varies among species, and this might severely bias results [34,39] particularly in view of the variation in biomass.”
In the citing paper
“Amplification of diverse multitemplate mixtures using universal primers can lead to highly unequal amplification efficiencies among products [39,49].”
In the citing paper
“Piñol et al. [39] proposed a relationship between biomass and sequence reads, but did not systematically examine this hypothesis.”
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) · PubMed · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15145663 · Cited by 15,546
A Greedy Algorithm for Aligning DNA Sequences
Zhang, Z., Schwartz, S., Wagner, L., & Miller, W. (2000) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/10665270050081478 · Cited by 5,459
Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets
Schmieder, R., & Edwards, R. A. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 · Cited by 5,119
Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”
Sogin, M. L., Morrison, H. G., Huber, J. A., Welch, D. B. M., Huse, S. M., Neal, P. R., Arrieta, J. M., & Herndl, G. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605127103 · Cited by 3,803
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
von Wintzingerode, F., Göbel, U. B., & Stackebrandt, E. S. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x · Cited by 2,085
Quail, M., Smith, M. E., Coupland, P., Otto, T. D., Harris, S. R., Connor, T. R., Bertoni, A., Swerdlow, H. P., & Gu, Y. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-341 · Cited by 2,031
Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding
TABERLET, P., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., BROCHMANN, C., & WILLERSLEV, E. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05470.x · Cited by 1,907
Leray, M., Yang, J., Meyer, C., Mills, S. C., Agudelo, N., Ranwez, V., Boehm, J. T., & Machida, R. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-34 · Cited by 1,648
Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4Preprint
Huson, D. H., Mitra, S., Ruscheweyh, H., Weber, N., & Schuster, S. C. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.120618.111 · Cited by 1,559
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 425
Using metatranscriptomics to estimate the diversity and composition of zooplankton communities
Lopez, M. L. D., Lin, Y., Sato, M., Hsieh, C., Shiah, F., & Machida, R. J. (2021) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13506 · Cited by 19
Greater topoclimatic control of above‐ versus below‐ground communities
Mod, H. K., Scherrer, D., Cola, V. D., Broennimann, O., Blandenier, Q., Breiner, F. T., Buri, A., Goudet, J., Guex, N., Lara, E., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15330 · Cited by 18
Feist, S. M., & Lance, R. F. (2021) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.66.60751 · Cited by 18
Yang, X., Yu, X., Zhang, X., Guo, H., Xing, Z., Xu, L., Wang, J., Shen, Y., Yu, J., Lv, P., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.819822 · Cited by 18
Hoenig, B. D., Trevelline, B. K., Kautz, A. R., Latta, S. C., & Porter, B. A. (2022) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16688 · Cited by 18
Koblmüller, S., Resl, P., Klar, N., Bauer, H., Zangl, L., & Hahn, C. (2024) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d16040196 · Cited by 18
Garrido‐Sanz, L., Senar, M. À., & Piñol, J. (2020) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.4.48281 · Cited by 18
Self-citationGarrido‐Sanz, L., Senar, M. À., & Piñol, J. (2021) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13464 · Cited by 18
Self-citationHines, I. S., Santiago-Morales, K. D., Ferguson, C. S., Clarington, J., Thompson, M., Rauschenbach, M., Levine, U., Drahos, D. J., Aylward, F. O., Smith, S. A., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.1021647 · Cited by 20
Macher, J., Zizka, V. M. A., Weigand, A. M., & Leese, F. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12937 · Cited by 18
Bonato, L., Peretti, E., Sandionigi, A., & Bortolin, F. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108264 · Cited by 17
Meredith, C. S., Hoffman, J. C., Trebitz, A. S., Pilgrim, E. M., Okum, S. L., Martinson, J. W., & Cameron, E. S. (2021) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.5.64735 · Cited by 21
BirT : A Novel Primer Pair for Avian Environmental DNA Metabarcoding
Thalinger, B., Empey, R., Cowperthwaite, M., Coveny, K., & Steinke, D. (2026) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.70255 · Cited by 16
Ant‐eating spider maintains specialist diet throughout its ontogeny
Gajski, D., Petráková, L., & Pekár, S. (2020) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12778 · Cited by 16
Ustinova, E. N., Schepetov, D. М., Lysenkov, S. N., & Tiunov, A. V. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108288 · Cited by 16
Kryshak, N. F., Fountain, E. D., Hofstadter, D. F., Dotters, B. P., Roberts, K. N., Wood, C. M., Kelly, K. G., Schwarcz, I. F., Kulzer, P. J., Wray, A. K., et al. (2022) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109678 · Cited by 16
Domènech, M., Wangensteen, O. S., Enguídanos, A., Malumbres‐Olarte, J., & Arnedo, M. A. (2022) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13625 · Cited by 15
The application of multi-locus DNA metabarcoding in traditional medicines
Arulandhu, A. J., Staats, M., Hagelaar, R., Peelen, T., & Kok, E. J. (2019) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2019.03.007 · Cited by 15
Paula, D. P., Barros, S. K. A., Pitta, R. M., Barreto, M. R., Togawa, R. C., & Andow, D. A. (2022) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giac020 · Cited by 15
Schmid, S., Straube, N., Albouy, C. P., Delling, B., Maclaine, J., Matschiner, M., Møller, P. R., Nocita, A., Palandačić, A., Rüber, L., et al. (2025) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaf140 · Cited by 14
Feng, Y. Z., Sun, D., Shao, Q., Chen, F., & Wang, C. (2023) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111183 · Cited by 14
Hawthorne, B. S. J., Cuff, J. P., Collins, L., & Evans, D. M. (2024) · Agricultural and Forest Entomology · doi:10.1111/afe.12628 · Cited by 14
Raclariu-Manolică, A. C., Mauvisseau, Q., de Paranaíba, R. T. F., de Boer, H., & Socaciu, C. (2023) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-023-04091-9 · Cited by 15
Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, E., Zizka, V. M. A., & Lynggaard, C. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0118 · Cited by 14
Marmesat, E., Soriano, L., Mazzoni, C. J., Sommer, S., & Godoy, J. A. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157402 · Cited by 14
Masonick, P., Hernandez, M., & Weirauch, C. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2712 · Cited by 14
Comparison of Seven DNA Metabarcoding Sampling Methods to Assess Diet in a Large Avian Predator
Paprocki, N. A., Blair, S., Conway, C. J., Adams, J. R., Nerkowski, S. A., Kidd, J. W., & Waits, L. P. (2024) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.70000 · Cited by 13
Turunen, J., Mykrä, H., Elbrecht, V., Steinke, D., Braukmann, T., & Aroviita, J. (2021) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 · Cited by 13
Govender, A., Singh, S. P., Groeneveld, J. C., Pillay, S., & Willows‐Munro, S. (2022) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16567 · Cited by 13
Frey, J. E., Frey, B., Frei, D., Blaser, S., Gueuning, M., & Bühlmann, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270897 · Cited by 13
Does phylogeny explain bias in quantitative DNA metabarcoding?
Liu, M., Burridge, C. P., Clarke, L. J., Baker, S. C., & Jordan, G. J. (2023) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.7.101266 · Cited by 13
Pereira, A., Xavier, R., Perera, A., Salvi, D., & Harris, D. J. (2019) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blz061 · Cited by 13
Chen, X., Yan, Z., Li, S., & Yao, M. (2025) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.70152 · Cited by 12
Stokell, J. R., Hamp, T. J., & Steck, T. R. (2016) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-016-0707-4 · Cited by 12
Gálvez‐Reyes, N., Arribas, P., Andújar, C., Emerson, B. C., Piñero, D., & Mastretta‐Yanes, A. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16195 · Cited by 12
Volpe, N. L., Thalinger, B., Vilacoba, E., Braukmann, T., Giacomo, A. S. D., Berkunsky, I., Lijtmaer, D. A., Steinke, D., & Kopuchian, C. (2021) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.1093/ornithapp/duab059 · Cited by 12
Paula, D. P., Timbó, R. V., Togawa, R. C., Vogler, A. P., & Andow, D. A. (2022) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13690 · Cited by 13
Kiragosyan, K., van Veelen, H. P. J., Gupta, S., Tomaszewska-Porada, A., Roman, P., & Timmers, P. H. A. (2019) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-019-0826-1 · Cited by 12
Wu, F., Zou, Y., Qin, S., Li, F., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Water · doi:10.3390/w15020308 · Cited by 11
Assessing the efficiency of COI primers in eDNA metabarcoding for marine metazoan biodiversity
Ren, W., Zhou, P., & Zhang, D. (2025) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107450 · Cited by 11
Ortíz, D., Dušátková, L. P., & Pekár, S. (2021) · Ecological Entomology · doi:10.1111/een.13114 · Cited by 11
Forsman, A., Savage, A. E., Hoenig, B. D., & Gaither, M. R. (2022) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icac090 · Cited by 11
Molecular assessment of dietary variation in neighbouring primate groups
Schneider, J., Brun, L., Taberlet, P., Fumagalli, L., & van de Waal, E. (2023) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14078 · Cited by 11
DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for quality control of botanicals and derived herbal products
Raclariu-Manolică, A. C., & de Boer, H. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85542-6.00004-4 · Cited by 10
Oladi, M., Wilding, T. A., Wyness, A. J., & Stoeck, T. (2024) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.70014 · Cited by 11
NAMERS: a purpose-built reference DNA sequence database to support applied eDNA metabarcoding
Westfall, K. M., Singer, G. A. C., Kaushal, M., Gilmore, S. R., Fahner, N. A., Hajibabaei, M., & Abbott, C. L. (2024) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.8.125095 · Cited by 10
Archived natural DNA samplers reveal four decades of biodiversity change across the tree of life
Junk, I., Hans, J., Perez‐Lamarque, B., Stothut, M., Weber, S., Gold, E., Schubert, C., Schumacher, A., Schmitt, N., Melcher, A. C., et al. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02812-6 · Cited by 10
Shi, J., Lei, Y., Li, H., & Li, T. (2021) · Journal of Oceanology and Limnology · doi:10.1007/s00343-021-0427-0 · Cited by 10
Paula, D. P., & Andow, D. A. (2022) · Neotropical Entomology · doi:10.1007/s13744-022-01011-3 · Cited by 10
Serrana, J. M., & Watanabe, K. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289056 · Cited by 9
Metabarcoding reveals striking dietary variation in a reintroduced mesocarnivore
Shively, K. A., Reese, E. M., Ransom, J. I., Wirsing, A. J., Lewis, J. C., Chestnut, T., Werntz, D. O., Whiteside, D. P., & Prugh, L. R. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf018 · Cited by 9
Unlocking historical plant interactions in herbarium collections
Daru, B. H., & Zhigila, D. A. (2025) · Nature Reviews Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44358-025-00071-8 · Cited by 9
Stepien, C. A., Schultz, H. K., McAllister, S. M., Norton, E., & Keister, J. E. (2023) · DNA · doi:10.3390/dna4010001 · Cited by 9
Schmiderer, C., Ruzicka, J., & Novak, J. (2015) · Molecular and Cellular Probes · doi:10.1016/j.mcp.2015.10.002 · Cited by 9
Pearson, C. E., Symondson, W. O. C., Clare, E. L., Ormerod, S. J., Bolaños, E. I., & Vaughan, I. P. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14459 · Cited by 9
Estimation of trophic niches in myrmecophagous spider predators
Dušátková, L. P., Pekár, S., Michálek, O., Líznarová, E., & Symondson, W. O. C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65623-8 · Cited by 9
Molecular Dimensions of Insect Taxonomy in the Genomics Era
Roe, A. D., Dupuis, J. R., & Sperling, F. A. H. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118945568.ch16 · Cited by 9
Markers or metagenomes: sequencing marine eukaryotic DNA for better biodiversity surveys
Patin, N., Pitz, K. J., Baker, J. D., Chávez, F. P., & Goodwin, K. D. (2025) · Metabarcoding and Metagenomics · doi:10.3897/mbmg.9.144935 · Cited by 8
Canals, O., Lanzén, A., Mendibil, I., Bachiller, E., Corrales, X., Andonegi, E., Cotano, U., & Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta, N. (2024) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.15754 · Cited by 8
Balech, B., Sandionigi, A., Manzari, C., Trucchi, E., Tullo, A., Licciulli, F., Grillo, G., Sbisà, E., Felici, S., Saccone, C., et al. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4845 · Cited by 8
Rucińska, A., Świerszcz, S., Nobis, M., Zubek, S., Boczkowska, M., Olszak, M., Kosiński, J. G., Nowak, S., & Nowak, A. S. (2021) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107683 · Cited by 8
Added value of metabarcoding combined with microscopy for evolutionary studies of mammals
Haarsma, A., Siepel, H., & Gravendeel, B. (2016) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/zsc.12214 · Cited by 10
Simone, Y., Chaves, C., van der Meijden, A., & Egeter, B. (2022) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.311 · Cited by 7
Loh, R. K., Kutty, S. N., Yeo, D. C. J., & Meier, R. (2022) · Environmental DNA · doi:10.1002/edn3.373 · Cited by 7
Neidel, V., & Traugott, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29019-8 · Cited by 7
Bookwalter, J. D., Niyas, A. M. M., Caballero‐López, B., Villari, C., Marco-Tresserras, J., Burgas, A., Ferrandiz‐Rovira, M., & López, B. C. (2023) · Community Ecology · doi:10.1007/s42974-023-00148-4 · Cited by 7
Soil nematode community profiling using reference-free mito-metagenomics
Qing, X., Karlicki, M., Guo, F., Karnkowska, A., & Li, H. (2024) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109613 · Cited by 7
Sarkis, C. M., Hoenig, B. D., Seney, E. E., Gaspar, S. A., & Forsman, A. (2022) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icac080 · Cited by 7
Todd, J. H., Simpson, R. M., Poulton, J., Barraclough, E. I., Villsen, K., Brooks, A., Richards, K. K., & Jones, D. (2020) · Agricultural and Forest Entomology · doi:10.1111/afe.12374 · Cited by 7
Wang, F., Xiong, W., Huang, X., & Zhan, A. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2025.11.019 · Cited by 6
Xu, L., Yang, D., Wang, Y., Li, J., Guo, X., Zeng, C., Jiang, H., An, M., & Shao, J. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w15010073 · Cited by 6
Galan, M., Bordes, A., Gauthier, P., Kane, M. D., Niang, Y., Pierre, É., & Granjon, L. (2023) · Mammalia · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2023-0021 · Cited by 6
Environmental DNA captured on the fish skin mucus – a potential bias to molecular diet analyses
Števove, B., Arendt, D., Švolíková, K. S., Szabóová, D., Žitňanová, K., & Gruľa, D. (2023) · Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems · doi:10.1051/kmae/2023013 · Cited by 6
Quantitating primer-template interactions using deconstructed PCR
Kahsen, J., Sherwani, S. K., Naqib, A. D., Jeon, T., Wu, L. Y. A., & Green, S. J. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.17787 · Cited by 6
Diets of Rodents Revealed through DNA Metabarcoding
Sato, J. J. (2024) · Mammal Study · doi:10.3106/ms2024-0018 · Cited by 6
Hao, L., Xu, X., Zhou, Y., Liu, D., Shao, J., Pan, J., He, G., Hu, Z., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2025.1509743 · Cited by 6
Zhang, X., Giusti, A., Li, S., Deng, W., Sun, Z., Li, Y., Peng, H., Hu, J., Armani, A., & Wen, J. (2025) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111338 · Cited by 6
Metabarcoding for use in Nordic routine aquatic biomonitoring - a validation study
Meissner, K. K., Aroviita, J., Baattrup‐Pedersen, A., Buchner, D., Ekrem, T., Friberg, N. R., Johnson, R. K., Leese, F., Majaneva, M., Ólafsson, J. S., et al. (2021) · TemaNord · doi:10.6027/temanord2020-538 · Cited by 6
Molecular assays to reliably detect and quantify predation on a forest pest in bats faeces
Baroja, U., Garin, I., Vallejo, N., Caro, A., Ibáñez, C., Basso, A., & Goiti, U. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06195-7 · Cited by 6
Predation patterns on the tundra—genetic barcoding of scats from two sympatric fox species
Wilkinson, C., Vigués, J., Angerbjörn, A., & Norén, K. (2022) · Arctic Science · doi:10.1139/as-2021-0051 · Cited by 6
Diet of a threatened rattlesnake (eastern massasauga) revealed by DNA metabarcoding
Swinehart, A., Partridge, C., Russell, A., Thacker, A. J., Kovach, J., & Moore, J. A. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10029 · Cited by 6
Dietary analysis of the House Swift (Apus nipalensis) in Hong Kong using prey DNA in faecal samples
Chung, C. T., Wong, H. S., Kwok, M. L., Meng, Q., & Chan, K. M. (2021) · Avian Research · doi:10.1186/s40657-021-00242-z · Cited by 6
Ji, Y., Huotari, T., Roslin, T. V., Schmidt, N. M., Wang, J., Yu, D. W., & Ovaskainen, O. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/533737 · Cited by 6
A metabarcoding framework for wild bee assessment in Luxembourg
Herrera‐Mesías, F., Jarboui, I. K. E., & Weigand, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Hymenoptera Research · doi:10.3897/jhr.94.84617 · Cited by 5
Estimating relative per capita predation rates from molecular gut content analysis
Andow, D. A., & Paula, D. P. (2024) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105499 · Cited by 5
Distance-decay reveals contrasting effects of land-use types on arthropod community homogenisation
Decker, O., Uhler, J., Redlich, S., Chao, A., Kortmann, M., Steffan-Dewenter, I. D., Tobisch, C., Ewald, J., Englmeier, J., Fricke, U., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67612-9 · Cited by 5
Addressing nontarget amplification in DNA metabarcoding studies of arthropod-feeding rodents
Klure, D. M., Greenhalgh, R., & Dearing, M. D. (2022) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-022-00646-2 · Cited by 5
Tebbe, J., Ottensmann, M., Havenstein, K., Efstratiou, A., Lenz, T. L., Caspers, B. A., Forcada, J., Tiedemann, R., & Hoffman, J. I. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21658-7 · Cited by 5
Wang, G., Bai, X., Ren, Y., Su, Y., & Han, J. (2023) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115529 · Cited by 5
Brute force prey metabarcoding to explore the diets of small invertebrates
Flo, S., Vader, A., & Præbel, K. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11369 · Cited by 5
Zhang, X., Wang, W., Yu, X., Liu, Y., Li, W., Yang, H., Cui, Y., & Tian, X. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04387-1 · Cited by 5
Alshari, N. F. M. A. H., Ahmad, S. Z., Azlan, A., Lee, Y., Azzam, G., & Nor, S. A. M. (2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.6620/zs.2021.60-76 · Cited by 5
An efficient and robust laboratory workflow and tetrapod database for larger scale eDNA studiesPreprint
Axtner, J., Crampton‐Platt, A., Hörig, L. A., Mohamed, A., Xu, C. C. Y., Yu, D. W., & Wilting, A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/345082 · Cited by 5
Metabarcoding for Biodiversity Estimation
Krehenwinkel, H., Hans, J., Junk, I., Mahla, L., Melcher, A. C., Stothut, M., & Kennedy, S. R. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822562-2.00380-7 · Cited by 5
Urquía, D. O., Anslan, S., Asadobay, P., Moreira‐Mendieta, A., Miguel Vences, B., Chaves, J. A., & Páez‐Rosas, D. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10921 · Cited by 4
To Clamp or Not to Clamp: Enhancing Seed Endophyte Metabarcoding Success
Mertin, A. A., Blackall, L. L., Brumley, D. R., Liew, E. C. Y., & van der Merwe, M. M. (2025) · Seeds · doi:10.3390/seeds4030028 · Cited by 4
Zabala, J., Acebes, P., Madeira, M. J., Fernández, E., Gómez‐Moliner, B. J., & Cabodevilla, X. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-14837-9 · Cited by 4
Batuecas, I., Alomar, Ò., Castañé, C., Piñol, J., Gallardo-Montoya, L., & Agustí, N. (2022) · Journal of Pest Science · doi:10.1007/s10340-022-01554-9 · Cited by 4
Self-citationTremblay, J. A., Fontaine, G. L., Savard, J. L., Béland, J., Hébert, C., & Ibarzabal, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2022-0176 · Cited by 4
Miyajima-Taga, Y., Sato, M., Oi, K., Furuichi, N., & Inoue, N. (2024) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps14631 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Piñol, J., Mir, G., Gomez‐Polo, P., & Agustí, N.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- CRAG CSIC IRTA UAB UB Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193 Spain
- Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Piñol, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 819-830
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W2051331361
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology Resources (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- MINECO (CGL2010-18182, AGL2011-24349)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- PCR bias, primer-template mismatch, arthropods, COI barcoding, mock communities, amplification efficiency, annealing temperature, dietary assessment, species relative abundance
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Diagnostic Errors, Molecular Sequence Data, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Base Pair Mismatch, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review